PER90

Bet builder

Tackles are deliberately absent: books settle them on a definition our data does not record — see the publication rules. Cards price any card being shown, yellow or red; shots on target is the shots model thinned by each player’s own on-target rate — both re-passed the calibration gate that once benched them (see the methodology page).

Same-game combinations priced by simulation, not by multiplying legs. Legs in one match move together — a player’s minutes carry all his markets, possession pushes one team’s shots up and the other’s tackles down — so each fixture is simulated 10,000 times and a slip’s price is how often all its legs landed. How the simulation works is on the methodology page.

Fulham v Crystal Palace · Premier League · Saturday 5 September at 15:00 · 143 priceable legs from 10,000 simulated matches

Team

Dean HendersonGKCrystal Palace~90 min · starts 100%

Saves
Cards
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~90 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Saves: career 2.80/90 over 75 apps → model prices 3.13/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.11/90 over 75 apps → model prices 0.09/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.09/90 over 75 apps → model prices 0.09/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 75 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Bernd LenoGKFulham~90 min · starts 100%

Fouls won
Saves
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~90 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.13/90 over 76 apps → model prices 0.12/90 for this match

Saves: career 2.74/90 over 76 apps → model prices 2.54/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 76 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Alex IwobiFWDFulham~81 min · starts 96%

Fouls
Fouls won
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~81 minutes: starts 96% of his matches (~84 when he starts, ~25 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 0.44/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.47/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.47/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.54/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.75/90 over 64 apps → model prices 1.94/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 64 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jean-Philippe MatetaFWDCrystal Palace~71 min · starts 84%

Shots
Fouls
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~71 minutes: starts 84% of his matches (~80 when he starts, ~23 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 2.35/90 over 61 apps → model prices 2.06/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.88/90 over 61 apps → model prices 0.93/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.86/90 over 61 apps → model prices 0.88/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.08/90 over 61 apps → model prices 0.10/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 61 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jørgen Strand LarsenFWDCrystal Palace~65 min · starts 86%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~65 minutes: starts 86% of his matches (~72 when he starts, ~25 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 1.78/90 over 13 apps → model prices 2.05/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.77/90 over 13 apps → model prices 1.07/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.82/90 over 13 apps → model prices 1.79/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.13/90 over 13 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 13 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Rodrigo MunizFWDFulham~38 min · starts 35%

Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~38 minutes: starts 35% of his matches (~74 when he starts, ~18 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 1.55/90 over 20 apps → model prices 1.70/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.97/90 over 20 apps → model prices 3.48/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 2.32/90 over 20 apps → model prices 2.22/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.06/90 over 20 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 20 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ismaïla SarrFWDCrystal Palace~74 min · starts 82%

Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~74 minutes: starts 82% of his matches (~85 when he starts, ~25 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.80/90 over 58 apps → model prices 1.71/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.92/90 over 58 apps → model prices 1.67/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.47/90 over 58 apps → model prices 0.54/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.11/90 over 58 apps → model prices 0.10/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 58 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Will HughesMIDCrystal Palace~58 min · starts 67%

Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~58 minutes: starts 67% of his matches (~75 when he starts, ~22 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 2.29/90 over 47 apps → model prices 2.19/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.89/90 over 47 apps → model prices 0.85/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.34/90 over 47 apps → model prices 1.36/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.47/90 over 47 apps → model prices 0.42/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 47 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Daniel MuñozDEFCrystal Palace~85 min · starts 100%

Cards
Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~85 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~85 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.29/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.26/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.46/90 over 64 apps → model prices 1.30/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.00/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.77/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.58/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.58/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 64 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Eddie NketiahFWDCrystal Palace~35 min · starts 27%

Cards
Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~35 minutes: starts 27% of his matches (~77 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.16/90 over 19 apps → model prices 0.27/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 2.34/90 over 19 apps → model prices 2.22/90 for this match

Shots: career 3.55/90 over 19 apps → model prices 3.10/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.70/90 over 19 apps → model prices 1.90/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 19 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Kenny TeteDEFFulham~81 min · starts 95%

Cards
Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~81 minutes: starts 95% of his matches (~85 when he starts, ~8 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.18/90 over 42 apps → model prices 0.22/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.57/90 over 42 apps → model prices 1.34/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.99/90 over 42 apps → model prices 0.96/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.16/90 over 42 apps → model prices 1.10/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 42 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Emile Smith RoweMIDFulham~56 min · starts 66%

Cards
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~56 minutes: starts 66% of his matches (~74 when he starts, ~21 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.07/90 over 51 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.72/90 over 51 apps → model prices 0.81/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.69/90 over 51 apps → model prices 0.78/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.56/90 over 51 apps → model prices 1.90/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 51 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Yéremy PinoFWDCrystal Palace~62 min · starts 76%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~62 minutes: starts 76% of his matches (~74 when he starts, ~22 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 1.56/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.68/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.13/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.09/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.72/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.22/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.34/90 over 28 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 28 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

KevinFWDFulham~40 min · starts 35%

Cards
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~40 minutes: starts 35% of his matches (~69 when he starts, ~24 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.00/90 over 13 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.07/90 over 13 apps → model prices 2.53/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.27/90 over 13 apps → model prices 1.41/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.15/90 over 13 apps → model prices 1.22/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 13 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Calvin BasseyDEFFulham~86 min · starts 95%

Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~86 minutes: starts 95% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~9 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.16/90 over 62 apps → model prices 1.06/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.44/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.47/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.87/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.79/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.19/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 62 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ryan SessegnonDEFFulham~56 min · starts 63%

Cards
Shots
Fouls
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~56 minutes: starts 63% of his matches (~82 when he starts, ~12 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.04/90 over 28 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.08/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.09/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.80/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.63/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.24/90 over 28 apps → model prices 0.41/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 28 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Adama TraoréFWD~40 min · starts 37%

Shots
Fouls
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~40 minutes: starts 37% of his matches (~77 when he starts, ~18 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 1.63/90 over 25 apps → model prices 2.23/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.38/90 over 25 apps → model prices 1.47/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.78/90 over 25 apps → model prices 1.86/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.10/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.22/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 25 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Daichi KamadaMIDCrystal Palace~56 min · starts 60%

Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~56 minutes: starts 60% of his matches (~81 when he starts, ~19 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.33/90 over 42 apps → model prices 1.36/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.94/90 over 42 apps → model prices 1.05/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.56/90 over 42 apps → model prices 1.55/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.20/90 over 42 apps → model prices 0.26/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 42 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Sander BergeMIDFulham~78 min · starts 91%

Cards
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~78 minutes: starts 91% of his matches (~84 when he starts, ~21 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.20/90 over 61 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.30/90 over 61 apps → model prices 0.41/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.44/90 over 61 apps → model prices 0.50/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.16/90 over 61 apps → model prices 1.10/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 61 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Adam WhartonMIDCrystal Palace~72 min · starts 83%

Cards
Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~72 minutes: starts 83% of his matches (~81 when he starts, ~26 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.16/90 over 50 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.20/90 over 50 apps → model prices 1.16/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.06/90 over 50 apps → model prices 0.87/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.10/90 over 50 apps → model prices 1.12/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 50 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Josh KingMIDFulham~36 min · starts 40%

Cards
Fouls
Fouls won
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~36 minutes: starts 40% of his matches (~66 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.16/90 over 18 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.80/90 over 18 apps → model prices 1.05/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.83/90 over 18 apps → model prices 1.85/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.75/90 over 18 apps → model prices 2.32/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 18 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jefferson LermaMIDCrystal Palace~63 min · starts 69%

Cards
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~63 minutes: starts 69% of his matches (~81 when he starts, ~22 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.31/90 over 48 apps → model prices 0.29/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.34/90 over 48 apps → model prices 1.31/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.24/90 over 48 apps → model prices 1.28/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.93/90 over 48 apps → model prices 0.80/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 48 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Oscar BobbFWDFulham~41 min · starts 43%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~41 minutes: starts 43% of his matches (~66 when he starts, ~22 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.36/90 over 7 apps → model prices 1.13/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.73/90 over 7 apps → model prices 0.90/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.63/90 over 7 apps → model prices 1.90/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.00/90 over 7 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 7 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Antonee RobinsonDEFFulham~80 min · starts 90%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~80 minutes: starts 90% of his matches (~88 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 0.43/90 over 52 apps → model prices 0.50/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.57/90 over 52 apps → model prices 0.60/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.91/90 over 52 apps → model prices 0.85/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.26/90 over 52 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 52 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Joachim AndersenDEFFulham~88 min · starts 100%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~88 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~88 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.54/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.52/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.83/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.74/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.58/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.60/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.26/90 over 62 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 62 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Tyrick MitchellDEFCrystal Palace~85 min · starts 97%

Cards
Shots
Fouls
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~85 minutes: starts 97% of his matches (~86 when he starts, ~44 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.11/90 over 75 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.44/90 over 75 apps → model prices 0.38/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.67/90 over 75 apps → model prices 0.66/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.75/90 over 75 apps → model prices 0.73/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 75 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Tom CairneyMIDFulham~28 min · starts 18%

Cards
Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~28 minutes: starts 18% of his matches (~71 when he starts, ~18 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.11/90 over 14 apps → model prices 0.27/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.48/90 over 14 apps → model prices 1.63/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.90/90 over 14 apps → model prices 2.06/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.74/90 over 14 apps → model prices 1.25/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 14 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Timothy CastagneDEFFulham~65 min · starts 69%

Cards
Shots
Fouls
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~65 minutes: starts 69% of his matches (~88 when he starts, ~14 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.13/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.17/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.48/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.56/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.86/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.88/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.45/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.52/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 40 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jaydee CanvotDEFCrystal Palace~67 min · starts 70%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~67 minutes: starts 70% of his matches (~88 when he starts, ~18 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.48/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.49/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.82/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.83/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.48/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.44/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.21/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 16 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Cheick DoucouréMIDCrystal Palace~35 min · starts 31%

Fouls
Fouls won
Shots
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~35 minutes: starts 31% of his matches (~56 when he starts, ~26 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 1.21/90 over 7 apps → model prices 1.56/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.21/90 over 7 apps → model prices 1.26/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.21/90 over 7 apps → model prices 0.95/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.24/90 over 7 apps → model prices 0.30/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 7 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Chadi RiadDEFCrystal Palace~64 min · starts 70%

Cards
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~64 minutes: starts 70% of his matches (~79 when he starts, ~30 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.29/90 over 9 apps → model prices 0.22/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.43/90 over 9 apps → model prices 0.43/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.43/90 over 9 apps → model prices 0.48/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.86/90 over 9 apps → model prices 0.85/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 9 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Justin DevennyMIDCrystal Palace~30 min · starts 25%

Cards
Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~30 minutes: starts 25% of his matches (~79 when he starts, ~13 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.09/90 over 14 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.91/90 over 14 apps → model prices 1.16/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.27/90 over 14 apps → model prices 1.62/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.00/90 over 14 apps → model prices 1.32/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 14 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Chris RichardsDEFCrystal Palace~83 min · starts 93%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~83 minutes: starts 93% of his matches (~89 when he starts, ~13 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 0.52/90 over 53 apps → model prices 0.43/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.17/90 over 53 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.54/90 over 53 apps → model prices 0.56/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.11/90 over 53 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 53 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jorge CuencaDEFFulham~56 min · starts 65%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~56 minutes: starts 65% of his matches (~85 when he starts, ~2 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 0.14/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.36/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.21/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.34/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.78/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.82/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.35/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.23/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Romain EsseFWDCrystal Palace~18 min · starts 9%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~18 minutes: starts 9% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~11 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 2.45/90 over 1 apps → model prices 1.63/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.65/90 over 1 apps → model prices 1.41/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.55/90 over 1 apps → model prices 2.16/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 1 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Nathaniel ClyneDEF~47 min · starts 52%

Cards
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~47 minutes: starts 52% of his matches (~72 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.18/90 over 14 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.36/90 over 14 apps → model prices 0.43/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.36/90 over 14 apps → model prices 0.57/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.44/90 over 14 apps → model prices 0.75/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 14 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Harrison ReedMIDFulham~10 min · starts 5%

Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~10 minutes: starts 5% of his matches (~63 when he starts, ~7 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 2.86/90 over 1 apps → model prices 2.68/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.00/90 over 1 apps → model prices 1.72/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.00/90 over 1 apps → model prices 1.54/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.00/90 over 1 apps → model prices 0.48/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 1 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Why no bookmaker prices? Same-game builder prices are proprietary — no odds feed carries them, and this page will not pretend to compare what it cannot see. The margin audit is the honest version: the one price that matters is the one your book quoted you, and you have it.

Every projection behind these simulations is currently provisional — no lineups are published yet, so minutes are estimated from start rates. A slip priced today can move when lineups land. Fair prices describe the model’s opinion, not a guarantee; every slip price is shown with its 95% simulation band, which widens as slips get longer — a long acca’s price rests on the few hundred simulations where every leg landed, and the band says exactly how few that is.

Slips are priced as if every named player takes part, because that is how the bet settles: UK books void a leg on a player who takes no part and re-price the rest, so the as-if-all-run number is the one your re-priced slip is actually comparable to. A player’s simulated minutes still split between starting and a bench cameo — only the no-show branch is treated as the refund it is.