PER90My betsAccount

Bet builder

Tackles are deliberately absent: books settle them on a definition our data does not record — see the publication rules. Cards price any card being shown, yellow or red; shots on target is the shots model thinned by each player’s own on-target rate — both re-passed the calibration gate that once benched them (see the methodology page).

Same-game combinations priced by simulation, not by multiplying legs. Legs in one match move together — a player’s minutes carry all his markets, possession pushes one team’s shots up and the other’s tackles down — so each fixture is simulated 10,000 times and a slip’s price is how often all its legs landed. How the simulation works is on the methodology page.

Sheffield United v Birmingham City · Championship · Saturday 15 August at 17:30 · 232 priceable legs from 10,000 simulated matches

Team

James BeadleGKBirmingham City~90 min · starts 100%

Fouls won
Cards
Saves
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~90 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.16/90 over 35 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.07/90 over 35 apps → model prices 0.11/90 for this match

Saves: career 2.38/90 over 35 apps → model prices 2.96/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 35 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ryan AllsopGK~90 min · starts 100%

Cards
Fouls won
Saves
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~90 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.18/90 over 11 apps → model prices 0.09/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.45/90 over 11 apps → model prices 0.15/90 for this match

Saves: career 1.73/90 over 11 apps → model prices 2.82/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 11 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Michael CooperGK~90 min · starts 100%

Cards
Fouls won
Saves
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~90 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~89 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.03/90 over 80 apps → model prices 0.11/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.17/90 over 80 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Saves: career 2.67/90 over 80 apps → model prices 2.46/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 80 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Adam DaviesGK~87 min · starts 94%

Cards
Fouls won
Saves
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~87 minutes: starts 94% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~44 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.06/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.12/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.19/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.15/90 for this match

Saves: career 2.44/90 over 16 apps → model prices 2.44/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 16 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Patrick BamfordFWD~65 min · starts 79%

Cards
Fouls won
Shots on target
Fouls
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~65 minutes: starts 79% of his matches (~77 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.05/90 over 28 apps → model prices 0.12/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.79/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.56/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 3.19/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.21/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.72/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.38/90 for this match

Shots: career 5.90/90 over 28 apps → model prices 2.42/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 28 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jay StansfieldFWD~75 min · starts 93%

Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
Shots on target
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~75 minutes: starts 93% of his matches (~79 when he starts, ~29 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 2.03/90 over 44 apps → model prices 1.49/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.54/90 over 44 apps → model prices 1.80/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.27/90 over 44 apps → model prices 1.07/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.73/90 over 44 apps → model prices 0.59/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.26/90 over 44 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 44 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Tyrese CampbellFWD~52 min · starts 61%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Shots on target
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~52 minutes: starts 61% of his matches (~70 when he starts, ~24 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.94/90 over 70 apps → model prices 1.34/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.40/90 over 70 apps → model prices 1.40/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.65/90 over 70 apps → model prices 2.32/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 1.07/90 over 70 apps → model prices 0.96/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.15/90 over 70 apps → model prices 0.12/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 70 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Demarai GrayFWD~62 min · starts 73%

Fouls won
Fouls
Cards
Shots on target
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~62 minutes: starts 73% of his matches (~74 when he starts, ~29 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.83/90 over 37 apps → model prices 1.46/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.01/90 over 37 apps → model prices 1.41/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.28/90 over 37 apps → model prices 0.15/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.99/90 over 37 apps → model prices 0.62/90 for this match

Shots: career 3.08/90 over 37 apps → model prices 1.93/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 37 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Femi SerikiDEF~57 min · starts 58%

Shots
Cards
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~57 minutes: starts 58% of his matches (~84 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 0.44/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.60/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.17/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 4.16/90 over 64 apps → model prices 1.99/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.31/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.93/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.16/90 over 64 apps → model prices 0.18/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 64 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Sydie PeckMID~76 min · starts 84%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~76 minutes: starts 84% of his matches (~86 when he starts, ~26 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 2.47/90 over 85 apps → model prices 1.48/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.86/90 over 85 apps → model prices 1.06/90 for this match

Fouls: career 2.14/90 over 85 apps → model prices 1.28/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.43/90 over 85 apps → model prices 0.43/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.21/90 over 85 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 85 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Patrick RobertsFWD~63 min · starts 77%

Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~63 minutes: starts 77% of his matches (~77 when he starts, ~17 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 2.06/90 over 35 apps → model prices 1.77/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.22/90 over 35 apps → model prices 1.35/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.72/90 over 35 apps → model prices 1.38/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.38/90 over 35 apps → model prices 0.52/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.12/90 over 35 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 35 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Gustavo HamerMID~72 min · starts 81%

Fouls won
Shots on target
Fouls
Shots
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~72 minutes: starts 81% of his matches (~83 when he starts, ~26 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.14/90 over 81 apps → model prices 1.18/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.85/90 over 81 apps → model prices 0.48/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.55/90 over 81 apps → model prices 1.14/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.71/90 over 81 apps → model prices 1.54/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.36/90 over 81 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 81 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Thomas Christopher CannonFWD~47 min · starts 51%

Fouls won
Shots on target
Cards
Shots
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~47 minutes: starts 51% of his matches (~73 when he starts, ~19 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.85/90 over 53 apps → model prices 1.34/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 1.01/90 over 53 apps → model prices 0.78/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.08/90 over 53 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.59/90 over 53 apps → model prices 2.35/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.24/90 over 53 apps → model prices 1.41/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 53 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Marvin DuckschFWD~60 min · starts 76%

Cards
Shots on target
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~60 minutes: starts 76% of his matches (~73 when he starts, ~17 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.12/90 over 33 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.99/90 over 33 apps → model prices 0.80/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.43/90 over 33 apps → model prices 1.84/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.41/90 over 33 apps → model prices 1.16/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.40/90 over 33 apps → model prices 1.37/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 33 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Carlos Vicente RoblesFWD~58 min · starts 59%

Cards
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~58 minutes: starts 59% of his matches (~83 when he starts, ~24 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.19/90 over 17 apps → model prices 0.15/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.91/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.42/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.04/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.50/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.66/90 over 17 apps → model prices 0.81/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.59/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.86/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 17 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

August PriskeFWD~54 min · starts 53%

Shots
Shots on target
Cards
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~54 minutes: starts 53% of his matches (~81 when he starts, ~23 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 2.58/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.92/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.64/90 over 17 apps → model prices 0.68/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.09/90 over 17 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.54/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.33/90 for this match

Fouls: career 2.28/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.65/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 17 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Callum O'HareMID~73 min · starts 86%

Fouls won
Shots
Shots on target
Fouls
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~73 minutes: starts 86% of his matches (~81 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.48/90 over 92 apps → model prices 1.32/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.87/90 over 92 apps → model prices 1.35/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.47/90 over 92 apps → model prices 0.43/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.90/90 over 92 apps → model prices 0.96/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.03/90 over 92 apps → model prices 0.10/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 92 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Tomoki IwataMID~84 min · starts 93%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Cards
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~84 minutes: starts 93% of his matches (~88 when he starts, ~35 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.80/90 over 45 apps → model prices 1.01/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.39/90 over 45 apps → model prices 1.14/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.22/90 over 45 apps → model prices 0.98/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.19/90 over 45 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.27/90 over 45 apps → model prices 0.26/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 45 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Tom DaviesMID~41 min · starts 35%

Fouls won
Cards
Shots
Shots on target
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~41 minutes: starts 35% of his matches (~79 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 6.01/90 over 26 apps → model prices 2.24/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.51/90 over 26 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.23/90 over 26 apps → model prices 1.35/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.53/90 over 26 apps → model prices 0.42/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.14/90 over 26 apps → model prices 1.29/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 26 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Seung-Ho PaikMID~79 min · starts 88%

Shots
Shots on target
Fouls
Cards
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~79 minutes: starts 88% of his matches (~84 when he starts, ~34 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 1.09/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.98/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.35/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.27/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.19/90 over 43 apps → model prices 1.13/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.14/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.09/90 over 43 apps → model prices 1.09/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 43 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jhon Elmer Solis RomeroMIDBirmingham City~65 min · starts 76%

Shots on target
Fouls
Shots
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~65 minutes: starts 76% of his matches (~77 when he starts, ~26 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots on target: career 0.44/90 over 17 apps → model prices 0.35/90 for this match

Fouls: career 3.54/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.25/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.19/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.08/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.46/90 over 17 apps → model prices 1.15/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.40/90 over 17 apps → model prices 0.18/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 17 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Harrison BurrowsDEF~74 min · starts 80%

Fouls won
Shots
Shots on target
Cards
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~74 minutes: starts 80% of his matches (~87 when he starts, ~22 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.40/90 over 90 apps → model prices 1.03/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.37/90 over 90 apps → model prices 0.80/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.39/90 over 90 apps → model prices 0.23/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.05/90 over 90 apps → model prices 0.10/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.43/90 over 90 apps → model prices 0.62/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 90 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Kyogo FuruhashiFWD~36 min · starts 29%

Cards
Shots on target
Shots
Fouls
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~36 minutes: starts 29% of his matches (~74 when he starts, ~21 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.04/90 over 28 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 1.00/90 over 28 apps → model prices 0.70/90 for this match

Shots: career 3.14/90 over 28 apps → model prices 2.12/90 for this match

Fouls: career 2.02/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.84/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.68/90 over 28 apps → model prices 1.37/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 28 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Keshi AndersonFWD~38 min · starts 37%

Shots
Cards
Fouls
Fouls won
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~38 minutes: starts 37% of his matches (~67 when he starts, ~21 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 1.13/90 over 19 apps → model prices 1.96/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.16/90 over 19 apps → model prices 0.17/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.40/90 over 19 apps → model prices 1.78/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 2.72/90 over 19 apps → model prices 1.66/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.27/90 over 19 apps → model prices 0.72/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 19 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Daniel William John IngsFWD~26 min · starts 22%

Shots
Fouls won
Shots on target
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~26 minutes: starts 22% of his matches (~62 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 4.43/90 over 23 apps → model prices 2.74/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.19/90 over 23 apps → model prices 1.73/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 2.29/90 over 23 apps → model prices 0.96/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.69/90 over 23 apps → model prices 1.77/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 23 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Phil NeumannDEF~88 min · starts 100%

Fouls won
Shots
Shots on target
Cards
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~88 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~88 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.76/90 over 32 apps → model prices 0.72/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.34/90 over 32 apps → model prices 0.48/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.19/90 over 32 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.16/90 over 32 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.05/90 over 32 apps → model prices 0.81/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 32 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jaïro RiedewaldMIDSheffield United~59 min · starts 80%

Fouls won
Shots on target
Shots
Cards
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~59 minutes: starts 80% of his matches (~70 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.38/90 over 25 apps → model prices 1.14/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.15/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.38/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.54/90 over 25 apps → model prices 1.20/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.16/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.58/90 over 25 apps → model prices 1.09/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 25 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Japhet TangangaDEF~89 min · starts 100%

Cards
Fouls
Fouls won
Shots on target
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~89 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~89 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.20/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.07/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.79/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.00/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.80/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.18/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.84/90 over 40 apps → model prices 0.59/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 40 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Christoph KlarerDEF~90 min · starts 100%

Fouls
Shots on target
Cards
Fouls won
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~90 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~90 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 0.93/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.79/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.09/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.12/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.23/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.70/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.70/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.49/90 over 43 apps → model prices 0.48/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 43 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ollie ArblasterMID~57 min · starts 61%

Cards
Shots
Shots on target
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~57 minutes: starts 61% of his matches (~79 when he starts, ~23 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.18/90 over 33 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.81/90 over 33 apps → model prices 1.21/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.12/90 over 33 apps → model prices 0.34/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.03/90 over 33 apps → model prices 1.24/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.62/90 over 33 apps → model prices 1.08/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 33 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Kai WagnerDEF~87 min · starts 100%

Cards
Shots
Fouls
Shots on target
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~87 minutes: starts 100% of his matches (~87 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.08/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.33/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.50/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.75/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.79/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.06/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.88/90 over 16 apps → model prices 0.74/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 16 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Lewis KoumasFWD~33 min · starts 30%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
Shots
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~33 minutes: starts 30% of his matches (~66 when he starts, ~18 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.31/90 over 23 apps → model prices 1.75/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.71/90 over 23 apps → model prices 1.95/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.76/90 over 23 apps → model prices 0.68/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.98/90 over 23 apps → model prices 2.09/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.10/90 over 23 apps → model prices 0.17/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 23 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jack RobinsonDEF~83 min · starts 93%

Shots
Shots
Cards
Fouls
Shots on target
Fouls won
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~83 minutes: starts 93% of his matches (~78 when he starts, ~31 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 0.56/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.57/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.56/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.54/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.27/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.59/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.82/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.11/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.87/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.80/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.87/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.77/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.59/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.70/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.11/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.27/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.15/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Marc LeonardMID~46 min · starts 33%

Cards
Fouls won
Shots
Shots on target
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~46 minutes: starts 33% of his matches (~82 when he starts, ~27 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.17/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.28/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.13/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.85/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.15/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.07/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.31/90 for this match

Fouls: career 2.07/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.44/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Thomas DoyleMID~50 min · starts 50%

Shots on target
Shots
Cards
Fouls
Fouls won
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~50 minutes: starts 50% of his matches (~78 when he starts, ~22 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots on target: career 0.15/90 over 38 apps → model prices 0.34/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.00/90 over 38 apps → model prices 1.20/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.12/90 over 38 apps → model prices 0.17/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.14/90 over 38 apps → model prices 1.31/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.93/90 over 38 apps → model prices 1.16/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 38 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ben MeeDEF~84 min · starts 93%

Fouls won
Cards
Shots on target
Fouls
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~84 minutes: starts 93% of his matches (~86 when he starts, ~45 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.46/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.77/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.13/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.13/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.00/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.41/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.72/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.46/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.60/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ryan OneFWD~23 min · starts 11%

Fouls
Fouls won
Shots on target
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~23 minutes: starts 11% of his matches (~55 when he starts, ~19 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 3.45/90 over 18 apps → model prices 2.12/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.23/90 over 18 apps → model prices 1.73/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.45/90 over 18 apps → model prices 0.92/90 for this match

Shots: career 2.89/90 over 18 apps → model prices 2.70/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 18 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Willum Þór WillumssonMID~39 min · starts 50%

Cards
Shots
Shots on target
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~39 minutes: starts 50% of his matches (~71 when he starts, ~8 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.00/90 over 10 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.67/90 over 10 apps → model prices 1.13/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.00/90 over 10 apps → model prices 0.30/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.20/90 over 10 apps → model prices 1.19/90 for this match

Fouls: career 2.57/90 over 10 apps → model prices 1.52/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 10 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Alexander CochraneDEF~73 min · starts 86%

Cards
Shots on target
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~73 minutes: starts 86% of his matches (~83 when he starts, ~12 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.10/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.24/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.16/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.49/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.52/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.17/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.80/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.57/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.81/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 21 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Mark McGuinnessDEF~72 min · starts 84%

Fouls
Fouls won
Shots
Cards
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~72 minutes: starts 84% of his matches (~83 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 0.97/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.81/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.49/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.78/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.11/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.67/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.10/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.30/90 over 25 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 25 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Joe RothwellMID~43 min · starts 40%

Cards
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~43 minutes: starts 40% of his matches (~72 when he starts, ~24 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.11/90 over 10 apps → model prices 0.18/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.42/90 over 10 apps → model prices 1.28/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.30/90 over 10 apps → model prices 1.25/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.32/90 over 10 apps → model prices 1.30/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.05/90 over 10 apps → model prices 0.40/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 10 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Bright Osayi-SamuelDEF~58 min · starts 70%

Shots
Shots on target
Fouls won
Cards
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~58 minutes: starts 70% of his matches (~75 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Shots: career 0.09/90 over 27 apps → model prices 0.50/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.06/90 over 27 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 1.50/90 over 27 apps → model prices 0.89/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.33/90 over 27 apps → model prices 0.17/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.41/90 over 27 apps → model prices 0.97/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 27 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Sam McCallumDEF~42 min · starts 44%

Fouls
Shots on target
Shots
Fouls won
Cards
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~42 minutes: starts 44% of his matches (~75 when he starts, ~15 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls: career 0.69/90 over 54 apps → model prices 0.86/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.42/90 over 54 apps → model prices 0.25/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.41/90 over 54 apps → model prices 0.84/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 2.17/90 over 54 apps → model prices 1.30/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.15/90 over 54 apps → model prices 0.15/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 54 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ki-Jana HoeverDEF~36 min · starts 33%

Cards
Shots
Fouls won
Fouls
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~36 minutes: starts 33% of his matches (~76 when he starts, ~17 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 5.87/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.21/90 for this match

Shots: career 8.11/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.49/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 0.81/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.94/90 for this match

Fouls: career 2.70/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.24/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.22/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.40/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Tahith ChongMID~32 min · starts 33%

Fouls won
Shots on target
Shots
Cards
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~32 minutes: starts 33% of his matches (~62 when he starts, ~17 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 3.82/90 over 21 apps → model prices 1.52/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.33/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.46/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.95/90 over 21 apps → model prices 1.36/90 for this match

Cards: career 0.19/90 over 21 apps → model prices 0.20/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.02/90 over 21 apps → model prices 1.35/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 21 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Ethan LairdDEF~43 min · starts 45%

Cards
Fouls
Fouls won
Shots on target
Shots
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~43 minutes: starts 45% of his matches (~72 when he starts, ~20 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Cards: career 0.82/90 over 20 apps → model prices 0.19/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.83/90 over 20 apps → model prices 1.09/90 for this match

Fouls won: career 3.09/90 over 20 apps → model prices 1.11/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.12/90 over 20 apps → model prices 0.14/90 for this match

Shots: career 1.04/90 over 20 apps → model prices 0.61/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 20 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Rhys Norrington-DaviesDEFSheffield United~22 min · starts 20%

Fouls won
Shots
Fouls
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~22 minutes: starts 20% of his matches (~60 when he starts, ~12 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 0.76/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.95/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.29/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.75/90 for this match

Fouls: career 1.04/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.13/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Jamie ShackletonDEF~21 min · starts 13%

Fouls won
Fouls
Shots
Shots on target
why these numbers ▸

Projected ~21 minutes: starts 13% of his matches (~60 when he starts, ~16 as a sub). A sub appearance still settles an over — only a no-show voids it.

Fouls won: career 1.68/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.10/90 for this match

Fouls: career 0.88/90 over 15 apps → model prices 1.13/90 for this match

Shots: career 0.96/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.81/90 for this match

Shots on target: career 0.64/90 over 15 apps → model prices 0.24/90 for this match

Small samples are shrunk toward players in the same role and league — 15 appearances is weighted evidence, not gospel — and the opponent, venue and referee move the number from there.

Why no bookmaker prices? Same-game builder prices are proprietary — no odds feed carries them, and this page will not pretend to compare what it cannot see. The margin audit is the honest version: the one price that matters is the one your book quoted you, and you have it.

Every projection behind these simulations is currently provisional — no lineups are published yet, so minutes are estimated from start rates. A slip priced today can move when lineups land. Fair prices describe the model’s opinion, not a guarantee; every slip price is shown with its 95% simulation band, which widens as slips get longer — a long acca’s price rests on the few hundred simulations where every leg landed, and the band says exactly how few that is.

Slips are priced as if every named player takes part, because that is how the bet settles: UK books void a leg on a player who takes no part and re-price the rest, so the as-if-all-run number is the one your re-priced slip is actually comparable to. A player’s simulated minutes still split between starting and a bench cameo — only the no-show branch is treated as the refund it is.