Championship · England
MillwallvNorwich City
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260813-1451 · Tackles v20260813-1451 · Shots v20260813-1451 · Fouls won v20260813-1451 · Cards v20260813-1451 · Saves v20260813-1451
Model projections
Fouls56 playersHighest: Pelle Elkjær Mattsson, 1.47 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelle Elkjær MattssonMID | Norwich City | 1.60 | 83provisional | 1.47 | 43% | 33 | 024% 133% 224% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Josh CoburnFWD | Millwall | 1.82 | 66provisional | 1.34 | 38% | 38 | 031% 131% 221% 311% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Jovon MakamaFWD | Norwich City | 1.95 | 59provisional | 1.27 | 36% | 19 | 036% 129% 219% 310% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Femi AzeezMID | Millwall | 1.52 | 69provisional | 1.17 | 33% | 58 | 035% 132% 220% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Kellen FisherDEF | Norwich City | 1.36 | 76provisional | 1.15 | 32% | 74 | 034% 134% 220% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Ryan LeonardDEF | Millwall | 1.37 | 73provisional | 1.12 | 31% | 48 | 037% 132% 219% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Tristan CramaDEF | Millwall | 1.10 | 87provisional | 1.06 | 29% | 66 | 035% 136% 219% 37% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Anis Ben SlimaneMID | Norwich City | 1.50 | 61provisional | 1.01 | 27% | 46 | 039% 134% 218% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Jake CooperDEF | Millwall | 1.01 | 89provisional | 1.00 | 26% | 83 | 037% 136% 218% 36% 42% 5+0% |
| Jacob WrightMID | Norwich City | 1.72 | 50provisional | 0.95 | 25% | 28 | 044% 130% 215% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 56 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 56 →
Tackles56 playersHighest: Ryan Leonard, 2.16 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan LeonardDEF | Millwall | 2.67 | 73provisional | 2.16 | 57% | 48 | 021% 122% 220% 315% 410% 56% 6+6% |
| Casper De NorreMID | Millwall | 2.34 | 78provisional | 2.02 | 57% | 74 | 017% 126% 224% 316% 49% 54% 6+3% |
| Pelle Elkjær MattssonMID | Norwich City | 2.13 | 83provisional | 1.96 | 55% | 33 | 018% 127% 224% 316% 49% 54% 6+3% |
| Kenny McLeanMID | Norwich City | 2.00 | 87provisional | 1.93 | 55% | 74 | 018% 127% 224% 316% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Kellen FisherDEF | Norwich City | 2.21 | 76provisional | 1.87 | 52% | 74 | 021% 126% 222% 315% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Joe BryanDEF | Millwall | 2.38 | 69provisional | 1.83 | 49% | 45 | 027% 124% 219% 314% 48% 54% 6+4% |
| Billy MitchellMID | Millwall | 2.58 | 62provisional | 1.79 | 48% | 34 | 027% 125% 219% 313% 48% 54% 6+4% |
| Tristan CramaDEF | Millwall | 1.78 | 87provisional | 1.72 | 49% | 66 | 021% 130% 224% 314% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Ali AhmedMID | Norwich City | 2.16 | 69provisional | 1.66 | 47% | 16 | 025% 129% 222% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Jack StaceyDEF | Norwich City | 2.60 | 54provisional | 1.56 | 40% | 47 | 034% 126% 217% 311% 46% 54% 6+3% |
10 of 56 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 56 →
Shots56 playersHighest: Femi Azeez, 2.13 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Femi AzeezMID | Millwall | 2.77 | 69provisional | 2.13 | 58% | 58 | 019% 123% 221% 316% 410% 56% 6+4% |
| Joshua SargentFWD | Norwich City | 2.10 | 81provisional | 1.90 | 55% | 53 | 018% 128% 225% 316% 48% 54% 6+2% |
| Mihailo IvanovićFWD | Millwall | 2.45 | 63provisional | 1.70 | 47% | 60 | 027% 127% 220% 313% 47% 54% 6+2% |
| Josh CoburnFWD | Millwall | 2.27 | 66provisional | 1.66 | 47% | 38 | 025% 128% 222% 314% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Mohamed ToureFWD | Norwich City | 2.53 | 54provisional | 1.52 | 43% | 9 | 025% 132% 223% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Thierno Mamadou Lamarana BalloFWD | Millwall | 2.12 | 60provisional | 1.40 | 40% | 25 | 033% 128% 220% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Camiel NeghliFWD | Millwall | 1.76 | 71provisional | 1.38 | 39% | 43 | 030% 131% 221% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Jovon MakamaFWD | Norwich City | 2.04 | 59provisional | 1.32 | 37% | 19 | 035% 128% 218% 310% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Edmond-Paris MaghomaMID | Norwich City | 1.82 | 59provisional | 1.20 | 33% | 12 | 034% 133% 219% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Emiliano Marcondes Camargo HansenMID | Norwich City | 1.60 | 60provisional | 1.06 | 29% | 38 | 040% 132% 217% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 56 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 56 →
Fouls won56 playersHighest: Pelle Elkjær Mattsson, 1.78 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelle Elkjær MattssonMID | Norwich City | 1.95 | 83provisional | 1.78 | 52% | 33 | 019% 129% 225% 315% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Kenny McLeanMID | Norwich City | 1.81 | 87provisional | 1.75 | 51% | 74 | 019% 130% 225% 315% 47% 53% 6+1% |
| Ali AhmedMID | Norwich City | 1.84 | 69provisional | 1.41 | 40% | 16 | 028% 132% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Emiliano Marcondes Camargo HansenMID | Norwich City | 1.98 | 60provisional | 1.31 | 37% | 38 | 033% 131% 219% 310% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Kellen FisherDEF | Norwich City | 1.33 | 76provisional | 1.13 | 31% | 74 | 035% 133% 219% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Harry DarlingDEF | Norwich City | 1.16 | 86provisional | 1.11 | 30% | 34 | 035% 134% 219% 38% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Ryan LeonardDEF | Millwall | 1.33 | 73provisional | 1.08 | 30% | 48 | 039% 131% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Japhet TangangaDEF | Millwall | 1.08 | 89provisional | 1.07 | 29% | 42 | 036% 136% 219% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Josh CoburnFWD | Millwall | 1.45 | 66provisional | 1.06 | 29% | 38 | 039% 132% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Joshua SargentFWD | Norwich City | 1.03 | 81provisional | 0.93 | 24% | 53 | 041% 135% 216% 36% 41% 5+0% |
10 of 56 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 56 →
Cards56 playersHighest: Pelle Elkjær Mattsson, 0.24 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow, second yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card". The trends column counts the same thing.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelle Elkjær MattssonMID | Norwich City | 0.26 | 83provisional | 0.24 | 21% | 33 | 079% 118% 22% 3+0% |
| Kellen FisherDEF | Norwich City | 0.25 | 76provisional | 0.21 | 19% | 74 | 081% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Tristan CramaDEF | Millwall | 0.17 | 87provisional | 0.17 | 15% | 66 | 085% 114% 2+1% |
| Jake CooperDEF | Millwall | 0.16 | 89provisional | 0.16 | 15% | 83 | 085% 114% 2+1% |
| Femi AzeezMID | Millwall | 0.21 | 69provisional | 0.16 | 15% | 58 | 085% 113% 2+1% |
| Ryan LeonardDEF | Millwall | 0.20 | 73provisional | 0.16 | 15% | 48 | 085% 113% 2+1% |
| Joe BryanDEF | Millwall | 0.21 | 69provisional | 0.16 | 15% | 45 | 085% 113% 2+1% |
| Anis Ben SlimaneMID | Norwich City | 0.21 | 61provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 46 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Zak Norton SturgeDEF | Millwall | 0.21 | 63provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 37 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Vladan KovačevićGK | Norwich City | 0.14 | 90provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 45 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
10 of 56 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 56 →
Saves2 playersHighest: Vladan Kovačević, 2.89 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vladan KovačevićGK | Norwich City | 2.89 | 90provisional | 2.89 | 53% | 45 | 07% 117% 222% 320% 415% 59% 6+9% |
| Maxime Teremoana CrocombeGK | Millwall | 2.63 | 90provisional | 2.63 | 48% | 23 | 09% 120% 223% 320% 413% 58% 6+7% |
1 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.