Championship · England
Queens Park RangersvBolton Wanderers
Referee
Edward Duckworth
6 matches on record — under 15, so the model falls back toward the league mean
Fouls per game
21.8
-6% vs league
League average
23.2
fouls per match, both teams
Angles
every priced linebuilderrefereeEdward Duckworth: 21.8 fouls and 5.8 cards a game (league 22.3 / 3.4)
-0.4 fouls and +2.4 cards against his league's average over his last 6.
Facts with sample sizes, not predictions. The market % beside a line is the books’ median price with margin in, and the over market runs hot.
Value — 2 live calls
- Amadou Mbengueover 1.50 Shots8.00 at bet365 · fair 4.00+100.0%
- Harvey Valeover 2.50 Shots2.25 at bet365 · fair 2.10+7.1%
Published at the price shown and scored against the closing line whatever happens next — the same rows, with staking context, are on the value board and in the track record.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260816-1555 · Shots v20260816-1555 · Shots on target v20260816-1555 · Fouls won v20260816-1555 · Saves v20260816-1229
Model projections
Fouls35 playersHighest: Richard Kone, 1.25 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard KoneFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.57 | 67provisional | 1.25 | 35% | 43 | 032% 133% 221% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Amadou MbengueDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 1.18 | 79provisional | 1.06 | 29% | 42 | 036% 136% 219% 37% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Daniel BennieFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.53 | 48provisional | 0.94 | 25% | 29 | 042% 133% 216% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Michael FreyFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.73 | 38provisional | 0.91 | 23% | 42 | 044% 133% 215% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Alfie LloydFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.73 | 37provisional | 0.89 | 22% | 28 | 045% 133% 215% 35% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Jonathan VaraneMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.22 | 59provisional | 0.88 | 23% | 76 | 044% 133% 215% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Jimmy DunneDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.86 | 89provisional | 0.85 | 21% | 85 | 043% 136% 215% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Paul SmythFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.35 | 46provisional | 0.83 | 20% | 80 | 046% 134% 214% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Kieran MorganMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.11 | 61provisional | 0.82 | 21% | 59 | 046% 134% 215% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Tariq LampteyDEF | — | 1.26 | 51provisional | 0.82 | 20% | 17 | 047% 133% 214% 35% 41% 5+0% |
10 of 35 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 35 →
Shots35 playersHighest: Ilias Chair, 2.12 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilias ChairMID | Queens Park Rangers | 2.67 | 68provisional | 2.12 | 59% | 44 | 016% 125% 224% 317% 410% 55% 6+4% |
| Richard KoneFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 2.38 | 67provisional | 1.85 | 52% | 43 | 021% 127% 222% 315% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Harvey ValeMID | Queens Park Rangers | 2.02 | 74provisional | 1.72 | 50% | 32 | 021% 129% 224% 314% 47% 53% 6+1% |
| Daniel BennieFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 2.69 | 48provisional | 1.58 | 43% | 29 | 028% 129% 220% 312% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Rayan KolliFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 2.36 | 53provisional | 1.53 | 43% | 43 | 026% 131% 222% 312% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Karamoko DembéléMID | Queens Park Rangers | 2.05 | 60provisional | 1.47 | 42% | 51 | 026% 132% 222% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Paul SmythFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 2.16 | 46provisional | 1.25 | 34% | 80 | 033% 133% 219% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Zan CelarFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 2.03 | 49provisional | 1.21 | 33% | 21 | 035% 132% 218% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Rumarn BurrellFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.66 | 60provisional | 1.18 | 33% | 31 | 035% 132% 219% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Ryan HardieFWD | Bolton Wanderers | 2.09 | 42provisional | 1.11 | 30% | 44 | 039% 132% 217% 38% 43% 51% 6+1% |
| Nicolas MadsenMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.37 | 62provisional | 1.00 | 26% | 69 | 040% 133% 217% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Alfie LloydFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.98 | 37provisional | 0.95 | 24% | 28 | 044% 132% 215% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Michael FreyFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.93 | 38provisional | 0.95 | 24% | 42 | 044% 132% 215% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Koki SaitoFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.41 | 55provisional | 0.93 | 24% | 74 | 043% 133% 216% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Kwame PokuFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.46 | 48provisional | 0.86 | 22% | 17 | 046% 132% 215% 35% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Jimmy DunneDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.84 | 89provisional | 0.83 | 20% | 85 | 044% 135% 215% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Kieran MorganMID | Queens Park Rangers | 0.94 | 61provisional | 0.68 | 16% | 59 | 053% 131% 212% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Samuel Iling-JuniorFWD | Bolton Wanderers | 1.41 | 38provisional | 0.68 | 16% | 53 | 055% 130% 211% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Amadou MbengueDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.74 | 79provisional | 0.67 | 15% | 42 | 052% 133% 211% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Isaac HaydenMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.01 | 51provisional | 0.62 | 14% | 46 | 056% 130% 210% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Steve CookDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.75 | 68provisional | 0.59 | 13% | 61 | 057% 130% 210% 32% 4+1% |
| Jonathan VaraneMID | Queens Park Rangers | 0.79 | 59provisional | 0.56 | 12% | 76 | 059% 129% 29% 32% 4+1% |
| Dennis CirkinDEF | — | 0.87 | 50provisional | 0.53 | 11% | 47 | 062% 127% 28% 32% 40% 5+0% |
| Liam MorrisonDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.56 | 79provisional | 0.50 | 9% | 31 | 062% 129% 28% 31% 4+0% |
| EsquerdinhaDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 1.00 | 32provisional | 0.43 | 8% | 16 | 067% 125% 26% 31% 4+0% |
| Ronnie EdwardsDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.46 | 83provisional | 0.43 | 7% | 51 | 066% 127% 26% 31% 4+0% |
| Tariq LampteyDEF | — | 0.64 | 51provisional | 0.39 | 7% | 17 | 069% 124% 26% 31% 4+0% |
| Ben DaviesDEF | — | 0.41 | 58provisional | 0.28 | 4% | 10 | 077% 119% 23% 3+1% |
| Jake Clarke-SalterDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.33 | 69provisional | 0.26 | 3% | 26 | 077% 120% 23% 3+0% |
| Lewis BruntDEF | Bolton Wanderers | 0.38 | 53provisional | 0.24 | 3% | 10 | 079% 118% 23% 3+0% |
| Akin FamewoDEF | Bolton Wanderers | 0.33 | 55provisional | 0.22 | 2% | 29 | 081% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Paul Nardi | Queens Park Rangers | 0.21 | 89provisional | 0.21 | 2% | 62 | 081% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Cyrus ChristieDEF | — | 0.30 | 23provisional | 0.10 | 1% | 11 | 091% 19% 2+1% |
| Pierce CharlesGK | Queens Park Rangers | 0.00 | 88provisional | 0.00 | — | 28 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Joe WalshGK | Queens Park Rangers | 0.00 | 88provisional | 0.00 | — | 24 | 0100% 1+0% |
All 35 players shown, ranked by projection. Show fewer ↥
Shots on target35 playersHighest: Ilias Chair, 0.79 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilias ChairMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.00 | 68provisional | 0.79 | 53% | 44 | 047% 134% 214% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Richard KoneFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.89 | 67provisional | 0.70 | 48% | 43 | 052% 132% 212% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Rumarn BurrellFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.81 | 60provisional | 0.58 | 42% | 31 | 058% 130% 29% 32% 4+1% |
| Rayan KolliFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.84 | 53provisional | 0.54 | 41% | 43 | 059% 130% 29% 32% 4+0% |
| Daniel BennieFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.93 | 48provisional | 0.54 | 39% | 29 | 061% 128% 29% 32% 40% 5+0% |
| Harvey ValeMID | Queens Park Rangers | 0.63 | 74provisional | 0.54 | 40% | 32 | 060% 130% 29% 32% 4+0% |
| Paul SmythFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.83 | 46provisional | 0.48 | 36% | 80 | 064% 127% 27% 32% 4+0% |
| Karamoko DembéléMID | Queens Park Rangers | 0.62 | 60provisional | 0.45 | 35% | 51 | 065% 127% 27% 31% 4+0% |
| Ryan HardieFWD | Bolton Wanderers | 0.82 | 42provisional | 0.44 | 34% | 44 | 066% 125% 26% 31% 4+0% |
| Zan CelarFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.72 | 49provisional | 0.43 | 33% | 21 | 067% 125% 26% 31% 4+0% |
10 of 35 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 35 →
Fouls won35 playersHighest: Paul Smyth, 1.23 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul SmythFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 2.18 | 46provisional | 1.23 | 34% | 80 | 034% 133% 219% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Karamoko DembéléMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.71 | 60provisional | 1.21 | 34% | 51 | 033% 134% 220% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Rayan KolliFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.90 | 53provisional | 1.21 | 34% | 43 | 033% 133% 220% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Koki SaitoFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.63 | 55provisional | 1.06 | 29% | 74 | 039% 132% 217% 37% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Jonathan VaraneMID | Queens Park Rangers | 1.29 | 59provisional | 0.89 | 23% | 76 | 045% 132% 215% 36% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Amadou MbengueDEF | Queens Park Rangers | 0.89 | 79provisional | 0.79 | 19% | 42 | 046% 134% 214% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Alfie LloydFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.67 | 37provisional | 0.78 | 19% | 28 | 050% 131% 212% 34% 41% 50% 6+0% |
| Harvey ValeMID | Queens Park Rangers | 0.82 | 74provisional | 0.70 | 16% | 32 | 051% 133% 212% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Kwame PokuFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 1.18 | 48provisional | 0.68 | 16% | 17 | 053% 131% 212% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Richard KoneFWD | Queens Park Rangers | 0.86 | 67provisional | 0.66 | 15% | 43 | 054% 131% 211% 33% 41% 5+0% |
10 of 35 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 35 →
Saves2 playersHighest: Pierce Charles, 2.88 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierce CharlesGK | Queens Park Rangers | 2.93 | 88provisional | 2.88 | 53% | 28 | 07% 117% 222% 320% 415% 59% 6+9% |
| Joe WalshGK | Queens Park Rangers | 2.61 | 88provisional | 2.56 | 46% | 24 | 010% 121% 224% 320% 413% 57% 6+6% |
2 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.