Premier League · England
Nottingham ForestvLeeds United
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260811-1858 · Tackles v20260811-1858 · Shots v20260811-1858 · Shots on target v20260811-1905 · Fouls won v20260811-1858 · Cards v20260811-1905 · Saves v20260812-1340
Model projections
Fouls41 playersHighest: Ethan Ampadu, 1.15 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
- Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.22
034%134%220%38%43%51%6+0% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.26
034%135%220%38%43%51%6+0% - Dominic Calvert-Lewinprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 1.14
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.32
035%133%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.05
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.45
041%130%217%38%43%51%6+0% - Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 1.04
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.80
041%131%217%37%43%51%6+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.03
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.11
037%135%218%37%42%51%6+0% - Sean Longstaffprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 44
- Proj.
- 1.01
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 2.06
049%124%213%37%44%52%6+1% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.38
042%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Ao Tanakaprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.95
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.31
044%131%216%37%42%51%6+0% - Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.95
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.18
041%134%217%36%42%50%6+0% - Ilia Gruevprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.29
044%131%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.11
041%134%216%36%42%50%6+0% - Joël Piroeprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.88
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.46
050%127%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Jayden Bogleprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.89
044%135%215%35%41%5+0% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.69
050%129%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Noah Okaforprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.83
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.33
048%131%214%35%42%50%6+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.34
049%130%213%35%42%50%6+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.48
050%129%213%35%42%50%6+0% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.08
048%133%214%34%41%5+0% - Gabriel Gudmundssonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 83
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.85
047%134%214%34%41%5+0%
20 of 41 players shown, ranked by projection.
Tackles41 playersHighest: Nicolás Martín Domínguez, 2.95 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
- Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 2.95
- O 1.5
- 69%
- Model /90
- 5.13
013%118%217%316%413%510%6+13% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 2.04
- O 1.5
- 60%
- Model /90
- 2.23
014%126%226%318%49%54%6+2% - Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 1.96
- O 1.5
- 58%
- Model /90
- 2.08
016%127%226%317%49%54%6+2% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.85
- O 1.5
- 53%
- Model /90
- 2.56
024%124%222%316%49%54%6+2% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.85
- O 1.5
- 54%
- Model /90
- 2.07
019%127%225%316%48%53%6+2% - Ao Tanakaprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.77
- O 1.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 2.43
025%125%221%315%48%54%6+2% - Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.71
- O 1.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 2.11
021%129%224%315%47%53%6+1% - Jayden Bogleprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 1.67
- O 1.5
- 49%
- Model /90
- 1.76
020%131%226%314%46%52%6+1% - Gabriel Gudmundssonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 83
- Proj.
- 1.60
- O 1.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 1.75
021%132%225%314%46%52%6+1% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.59
- O 1.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 1.71
021%132%225%314%46%52%6+1% - Ilia Gruevprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.57
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 2.14
027%128%222%313%46%53%6+1% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.55
- O 1.5
- 46%
- Model /90
- 1.61
022%133%225%313%45%52%6+1% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.49
- O 1.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 1.54
023%133%225%312%45%51%6+0% - Nicolò Savonaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.45
- O 1.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 1.78
027%131%223%312%45%52%6+1% - Nikola Milenkovićprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 1.35
026%135%223%311%44%51%6+0% - Jaka Bijolprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.33
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.58
029%132%222%311%44%51%6+0% - James Justinprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.29
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.77
036%127%219%311%45%52%6+1% - Joe Rodonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 88
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 1.28
029%135%222%39%43%51%6+0% - Felipe Rodriguesprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 2.34
040%127%215%39%45%52%6+1% - Sean Longstaffprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 44
- Proj.
- 1.23
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 2.51
043%124%214%39%45%53%6+2%
20 of 41 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots41 playersHighest: Dominic Calvert-Lewin, 1.83 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
- Dominic Calvert-Lewinprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 1.83
- O 1.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 2.11
023%127%222%314%48%54%6+3% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.76
- O 1.5
- 49%
- Model /90
- 2.09
023%128%222%314%47%53%6+2% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 1.68
- O 1.5
- 46%
- Model /90
- 2.42
026%128%221%313%47%53%6+2% - Daniel Jamesprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 58
- Proj.
- 1.61
- O 1.5
- 43%
- Model /90
- 2.52
032%125%218%312%47%54%6+3% - Joël Piroeprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 1.54
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 2.56
036%124%216%311%47%54%6+3% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.48
- O 1.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 2.01
029%130%220%311%45%52%6+1% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 1.38
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 2.28
034%129%218%310%45%52%6+2% - Noah Okaforprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 2.16
034%129%218%310%45%52%6+1% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 2.28
039%128%216%39%44%52%6+1% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.22
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.31
033%134%220%39%43%51%6+0% - Lukas Nmechaprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 35
- Proj.
- 1.16
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 3.02
043%128%214%37%44%52%6+2% - Degnand Wilfried Gnontoprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 1.14
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 2.41
044%126%214%38%44%52%6+1% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.09
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.19
037%134%218%37%43%51%6+0% - Dilane Bakwaprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 1.07
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 2.44
042%130%215%37%43%51%6+1% - Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.01
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.25
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.97
043%134%216%36%42%50%6+0% - Mateo Joseph Fernández Regatilloprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 33
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 2.49
053%125%211%35%43%52%6+1% - Largie Ramazaniprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 28
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 2.79
053%127%211%35%42%51%6+1% - Ilia Gruevprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.79
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.09
050%130%213%35%41%50%6+0% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.79
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.10
050%130%213%35%41%50%6+0%
20 of 41 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots on target39 playersHighest: Chris Wood, 0.82 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
- Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.82
- O 0.5
- 53%
- Model /90
- 0.97
047%133%214%35%41%5+0% - Dominic Calvert-Lewinprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 0.5
- 52%
- Model /90
- 0.93
048%132%214%35%41%5+0% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.60
- O 0.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 0.81
058%129%210%33%41%5+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.59
- O 0.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 0.98
059%128%210%33%41%5+0% - Joël Piroeprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.59
- O 0.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 0.99
061%125%210%33%41%5+0% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 0.58
- O 0.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 0.84
058%129%29%32%41%5+0% - Daniel Jamesprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 58
- Proj.
- 0.58
- O 0.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 0.90
060%127%29%33%41%5+0% - Noah Okaforprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.56
- O 0.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 0.89
060%128%29%32%41%5+0% - Lukas Nmechaprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 35
- Proj.
- 0.53
- O 0.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.38
064%124%28%33%41%5+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.45
- O 0.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 0.83
067%124%27%32%4+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.44
- O 0.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 0.47
065%127%26%31%4+0% - Dilane Bakwaprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.42
- O 0.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 0.95
069%124%26%31%4+0% - Degnand Wilfried Gnontoprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.39
- O 0.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 0.82
071%121%26%31%4+0% - Mateo Joseph Fernández Regatilloprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 33
- Proj.
- 0.37
- O 0.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.01
073%119%25%32%40%5+0% - Largie Ramazaniprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 28
- Proj.
- 0.36
- O 0.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.18
073%120%25%31%40%5+0% - Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.34
- O 0.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 0.42
072%123%24%3+1% - Taiwo Michael Awoniyiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 21
- Proj.
- 0.31
- O 0.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.33
076%119%24%31%4+0% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.31
- O 0.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 0.34
074%122%24%3+1% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.26
- O 0.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 0.36
078%119%23%3+0% - Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.24
- O 0.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.26
079%118%23%3+0%
20 of 39 players shown, ranked by projection.
Fouls won41 playersHighest: Brenden Aaronson, 1.06 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
- Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.06
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.31
039%132%217%37%43%51%6+0% - Dominic Calvert-Lewinprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 1.05
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.21
040%132%217%37%43%51%6+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.04
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.12
038%134%218%37%42%51%6+0% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.04
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.40
040%132%217%37%43%51%6+0% - Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.05
041%133%217%36%42%51%6+0% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.06
041%134%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.95
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.74
047%128%214%37%43%51%6+0% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.36
044%131%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.93
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.10
043%133%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Ilia Gruevprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.83
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.14
049%130%214%35%42%50%6+0% - Daniel Jamesprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 58
- Proj.
- 0.82
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.29
051%128%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 0.91
048%132%214%35%41%5+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.34
050%130%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Degnand Wilfried Gnontoprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.69
054%126%212%35%42%51%6+0% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.10
050%130%213%35%41%50%6+0% - Gabriel Gudmundssonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 83
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.85
048%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Jayden Bogleprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.76
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.80
049%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.50
054%128%211%34%42%51%6+0% - Noah Okaforprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.18
052%130%212%34%41%50%6+0% - Ao Tanakaprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.01
053%129%212%34%41%50%6+0%
20 of 41 players shown, ranked by projection.
Cards41 playersHighest: Ethan Ampadu, 0.21 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card" (D-048). The trends column alongside counts yellows only.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
- Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.21
- O 0.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.22
082%116%22%3+0% - Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 0.21
- O 0.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.36
082%116%22%3+0% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.21
083%115%22%3+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.20
083%115%22%3+0% - Sean Longstaffprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 44
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.38
084%113%22%3+0% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.25
084%114%22%3+0% - Felipe Rodriguesprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.34
084%113%22%3+0% - Jayden Bogleprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.18
084%114%2+1% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.18
084%114%2+1% - Gabriel Gudmundssonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 83
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.19
085%114%2+1% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.17
085%114%2+1% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.18
085%114%2+1% - Jaka Bijolprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.19
085%114%2+1% - Ao Tanakaprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.22
085%113%21%3+0% - Nicolò Savonaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.20
085%113%2+1% - Nikola Milenkovićprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.16
085%113%2+1% - Ilia Gruevprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.22
086%113%2+1% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.32
086%113%21%3+0% - Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.18
087%112%2+1% - James Justinprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.20
087%112%2+1%
20 of 41 players shown, ranked by projection.
Saves41 playersHighest: Lucas Estella Perri, 3.05 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
- Lucas Estella Perriprovisional
GK · Leeds United
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 3.05
- O 2.5
- 56%
- Model /90
- 3.05
07%116%221%320%415%510%6+11% - Matz Selsprovisional
GK · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 88
- Proj.
- 2.73
- O 2.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 2.79
09%119%222%320%414%58%6+8% - Jaka Bijolprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Sebastiaan Bornauwprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 37
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.01
0100%1+0% - Joe Rodonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 88
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Nikola Milenkovićprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Felipe Rodriguesprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Jayden Bogleprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ethan Ampaduprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Anton Stachprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Gabriel Gudmundssonprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 83
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Dominic Calvert-Lewinprovisional
FWD · Leeds United
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Brenden Aaronsonprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - James Justinprovisional
DEF · Leeds United
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ao Tanakaprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ilia Gruevprovisional
MID · Leeds United
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0%
20 of 41 players shown, ranked by projection.