Premier League · England
LiverpoolvNottingham Forest
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260813-1451 · Tackles v20260813-1451 · Shots v20260813-1451 · Shots on target v20260813-1536-sot · Fouls won v20260813-1451 · Cards v20260813-1451 · Saves v20260813-1451
Model projections
Fouls40 playersHighest: Ibrahim Sangaré, 1.28 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
- Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.28
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.77
034%129%220%310%44%51%6+1% - Alexis Mac Allisterprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 1.53
032%133%221%310%43%51%6+0% - Hugo Ekitikeprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.59
035%133%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 1.11
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 2.25
040%130%216%38%44%51%6+1% - Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.08
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 1.16
035%136%220%37%42%50%6+0% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 1.07
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.54
038%133%218%38%42%51%6+0% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.07
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.21
036%135%219%37%42%51%6+0% - Conor Bradleyprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.65
044%132%215%36%42%50%6+0% - Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.91
041%136%216%35%41%5+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.85
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.92
043%136%215%35%41%5+0% - Cody Mathès Gakpoprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.85
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.15
046%133%215%35%41%5+0% - Nicolò Savonaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.03
045%134%215%35%41%5+0% - Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 0.82
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.42
048%132%214%35%41%5+0% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.79
047%135%214%34%41%5+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.23
051%131%213%34%41%5+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.83
049%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Milos Kerkezprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.70
- O 1.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.95
052%131%212%33%41%5+0% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.68
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.71
051%134%212%33%4+1% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.67
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.79
052%133%212%33%4+1% - Florian Wirtzprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.66
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.82
053%132%211%33%41%5+0%
20 of 40 players shown, ranked by projection.
Tackles40 playersHighest: Neco Williams, 2.48 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
- Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 2.48
- O 1.5
- 65%
- Model /90
- 2.77
015%121%221%317%412%57%6+7% - Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 2.20
- O 1.5
- 56%
- Model /90
- 3.83
021%123%219%314%410%56%6+7% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 2.13
- O 1.5
- 56%
- Model /90
- 2.95
023%122%219%315%410%56%6+6% - Alexis Mac Allisterprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.94
- O 1.5
- 53%
- Model /90
- 2.38
021%126%222%315%49%54%6+3% - Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.72
- O 1.5
- 49%
- Model /90
- 1.83
021%130%224%314%47%53%6+2% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.68
- O 1.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 1.75
022%130%224%314%47%53%6+1% - Nicolò Savonaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.62
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 1.99
026%129%221%313%46%53%6+2% - Konstantinos Tsimikasprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 46
- Proj.
- 1.56
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 3.03
035%125%216%310%46%54%6+4% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.44
- O 1.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 1.49
026%133%222%311%45%52%6+1% - Milos Kerkezprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.82
033%129%219%310%45%52%6+1% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.33
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.50
031%132%221%310%44%51%6+1% - Curtis Jonesprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 1.25
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 2.08
037%129%217%39%44%52%6+1% - Felipe Rodriguesprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 2.17
044%127%214%38%44%52%6+1% - Nikola Milenkovićprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 1.16
034%134%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Conor Bradleyprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 1.10
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.99
040%131%217%38%43%51%6+1% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 1.09
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 2.20
042%130%215%37%43%52%6+1% - Florian Wirtzprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 1.02
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.27
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.06
040%135%217%36%42%50%6+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.92
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.68
047%129%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.91
042%135%216%35%41%5+0%
20 of 40 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots40 playersHighest: Mohamed Salah Ghaly, 3.07 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
- Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 3.07
- O 1.5
- 79%
- Model /90
- 3.10
06%115%221%321%416%510%6+11% - Hugo Ekitikeprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 2.37
- O 1.5
- 62%
- Model /90
- 3.29
016%122%221%317%411%57%6+6% - Cody Mathès Gakpoprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 2.18
- O 1.5
- 59%
- Model /90
- 2.98
018%123%221%316%411%56%6+5% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 2.14
- O 1.5
- 60%
- Model /90
- 2.42
016%124%224%317%410%55%6+4% - Florian Wirtzprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 1.74
- O 1.5
- 49%
- Model /90
- 2.16
022%128%223%314%47%53%6+2% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.60
- O 1.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 1.73
022%131%224%313%46%52%6+1% - Alexander Isakprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 1.58
- O 1.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 2.84
032%126%218%312%47%54%6+3% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 1.55
- O 1.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 2.23
027%129%222%313%46%52%6+1% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.52
- O 1.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 1.80
025%131%223%313%45%52%6+1% - Alexis Mac Allisterprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.29
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.59
031%132%221%310%44%51%6+1% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.97
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.31
041%133%217%36%42%51%6+0% - Rio Ngumohaprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 29
- Proj.
- 0.93
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 2.84
051%127%211%36%43%51%6+1% - Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.85
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.91
044%135%215%35%41%5+0% - Curtis Jonesprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.85
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.40
048%130%214%35%42%51%6+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.94
045%134%215%35%41%5+0% - Harvey Elliotprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 20
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 3.70
053%129%210%34%42%51%6+1% - Virgil van Dijkprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.78
047%135%214%34%41%5+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.71
- O 1.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 1.17
053%130%212%34%41%5+0% - Dilane Bakwaprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.68
- O 1.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 1.55
055%129%211%34%41%5+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.64
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 1.17
057%128%211%33%41%5+0%
20 of 40 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots on target37 playersHighest: Mohamed Salah Ghaly, 1.29 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
- Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 1.29
- O 0.5
- 71%
- Model /90
- 1.30
029%135%222%310%43%51%6+0% - Hugo Ekitikeprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 0.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 1.07
049%132%213%34%41%5+0% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 0.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 0.87
050%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.71
- O 0.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 0.81
050%133%212%33%41%5+0% - Cody Mathès Gakpoprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.69
- O 0.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 0.94
053%131%212%33%41%5+0% - Alexander Isakprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.63
- O 0.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 1.12
058%128%210%33%41%5+0% - Florian Wirtzprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.61
- O 0.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 0.75
056%131%210%32%4+1% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.59
- O 0.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 0.64
056%132%210%32%4+0% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 0.53
- O 0.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 0.76
061%129%28%32%4+0% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.38
- O 0.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 0.52
069%125%25%31%4+0% - Alexis Mac Allisterprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.38
- O 0.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 0.46
069%125%25%31%4+0% - Rio Ngumohaprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 29
- Proj.
- 0.35
- O 0.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.07
074%120%25%31%4+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.31
- O 0.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 0.51
074%121%24%3+1% - Virgil van Dijkprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.29
- O 0.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 0.29
075%122%23%3+0% - Curtis Jonesprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.29
- O 0.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 0.47
076%120%24%3+1% - Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.27
- O 0.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.29
077%120%23%3+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.26
- O 0.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 0.29
078%119%23%3+0% - Dilane Bakwaprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.25
- O 0.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.57
079%118%23%3+0% - Harvey Elliotprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 20
- Proj.
- 0.24
- O 0.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.08
080%116%23%31%4+0% - Taiwo Michael Awoniyiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 21
- Proj.
- 0.23
- O 0.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.97
081%116%23%30%4+0%
20 of 37 players shown, ranked by projection.
Fouls won40 playersHighest: Ryan Gravenberch, 1.22 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
- Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.22
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.30
031%135%221%39%43%51%6+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.19
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.33
034%133%220%39%43%51%6+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.07
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.15
036%135%219%37%42%51%6+0% - Cody Mathès Gakpoprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.06
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.45
039%132%218%38%43%51%6+0% - Alexis Mac Allisterprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.02
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.25
039%133%218%37%42%51%6+0% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 1.00
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 2.02
044%130%215%37%43%51%6+1% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 0.99
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.43
041%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Conor Bradleyprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.89
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.61
045%132%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Jeremie Frimpongprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.87
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.59
049%128%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Milos Kerkezprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.17
046%132%215%35%42%5+0% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.89
043%135%215%35%41%5+0% - Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.85
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.86
043%135%215%35%41%5+0% - Dilane Bakwaprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.83
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.88
049%130%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.79
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.32
050%131%213%35%41%50%6+0% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.87
048%134%213%34%41%5+0% - Curtis Jonesprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.20
053%130%212%34%41%5+0% - Florian Wirtzprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.69
- O 1.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.85
052%132%212%33%41%5+0% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.64
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.88
056%130%211%33%41%5+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.64
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 1.17
057%128%211%33%41%5+0% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.62
- O 1.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.73
055%132%210%32%4+1%
20 of 40 players shown, ranked by projection.
Cards40 playersHighest: Ibrahim Sangaré, 0.22 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow, second yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card". The trends column counts the same thing.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
- Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.22
- O 0.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.31
081%117%22%3+0% - Conor Bradleyprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.21
- O 0.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.38
081%116%22%3+0% - Giorgi Mamardashviliprovisional
GK · Liverpool
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.21
- O 0.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.22
081%117%22%3+0% - Ryan Yatesprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 0.20
- O 0.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.41
082%115%22%3+0% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.22
082%116%22%3+0% - Alexis Mac Allisterprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.24
083%116%22%3+0% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.19
083%115%2+2% - Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.19
083%115%2+2% - Felipe Rodriguesprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.32
085%113%22%3+0% - Nicolò Savonaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.21
085%114%2+1% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.19
085%114%2+1% - Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.28
085%113%2+1% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.17
086%113%2+1% - Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.15
086%113%2+1% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.15
087%112%2+1% - Nikola Milenkovićprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.14
087%112%2+1% - Milos Kerkezprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.18
087%112%2+1% - Virgil van Dijkprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.12
088%111%2+1% - Joe Gomezprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 37
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.27
090%19%2+1% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.18
090%19%2+1%
20 of 40 players shown, ranked by projection.
Saves40 playersHighest: Matz Sels, 3.39 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
- Matz Selsprovisional
GK · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 88
- Proj.
- 3.39
- O 2.5
- 63%
- Model /90
- 3.46
06%113%219%319%416%512%6+15% - Giorgi Mamardashviliprovisional
GK · Liverpool
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 2.64
- O 2.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 2.74
09%120%223%320%413%58%6+7% - Alisson Ramsés Beckerprovisional
GK · Liverpool
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.37
- O 2.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 2.38
011%123%225%319%412%56%6+5% - Nikola Milenkovićprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Temitayo Olufisayo Olaoluwa Ainaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Murillo Santiago Costa dos Santosprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Morgan Gibbs-Whiteprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Neco Williamsprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Chris Woodprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Nicolò Savonaprovisional
DEF · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ibrahim Sangaréprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Callum Hudson-Odoiprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruzprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 63
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Mohamed Salah Ghalyprovisional
FWD · Liverpool
- Mins
- 89
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Virgil van Dijkprovisional
DEF · Liverpool
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Omari Giraud-Hutchinsonprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ryan Gravenberchprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Nicolás Martín Domínguezprovisional
MID · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 52
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Dominik Szoboszlaiprovisional
MID · Liverpool
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Dan Ndoyeprovisional
FWD · Nottingham Forest
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0%
20 of 40 players shown, ranked by projection.