Serie A · Italy
VeneziavLecce
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260813-1451 · Tackles v20260813-1451 · Shots v20260813-1451 · Fouls won v20260813-1451 · Cards v20260813-1451 · Saves v20260813-1451
Model projections
Fouls44 playersHighest: Santiago Pierotti, 1.68 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago PierottiFWD | Lecce | 2.41 | 63provisional | 1.68 | 48% | 59 | 023% 129% 223% 314% 47% 53% 6+1% |
| Alessio ZerbinMID | Venezianow at Frosinone | 1.75 | 84provisional | 1.65 | 48% | 17 | 022% 130% 225% 314% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Enrique Pérez MuñozMID | Venezia | 2.10 | 70provisional | 1.63 | 47% | 13 | 023% 129% 223% 314% 46% 53% 6+1% |
| Hans Nicolussi CavigliaMID | Venezianow at Parma | 1.51 | 82provisional | 1.38 | 40% | 33 | 027% 133% 223% 311% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Jay IdzesDEF | Venezia | 1.37 | 89provisional | 1.36 | 39% | 35 | 026% 135% 223% 311% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Gaetano Pio OristanioMID | Venezianow at Torino | 1.90 | 63provisional | 1.33 | 38% | 32 | 029% 133% 222% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Fali CandéDEF | Venezia | 1.31 | 90provisional | 1.31 | 38% | 17 | 027% 135% 223% 310% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Lameck BandaFWD | Lecce | 2.28 | 50provisional | 1.28 | 36% | 36 | 032% 132% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Joseph Alfred DuncanMID | Venezia | 1.90 | 60provisional | 1.26 | 36% | 12 | 036% 128% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Balthazar PierretMID | Lecce | 2.08 | 53provisional | 1.22 | 34% | 25 | 035% 131% 219% 39% 44% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 44 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 44 → 5 of the 44 have since left the club — the squad is built from who has played for these teams, not from who is registered today, so they are shown rather than quietly dropped.
Tackles44 playersHighest: Ylber Ramadani, 2.27 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ylber RamadaniMID | Lecce | 2.68 | 76provisional | 2.27 | 61% | 61 | 016% 123% 222% 317% 411% 56% 6+5% |
| Alessio ZerbinMID | Venezianow at Frosinone | 2.41 | 84provisional | 2.26 | 62% | 17 | 015% 123% 223% 317% 411% 56% 6+5% |
| Danilo Filipe Melo VeigaDEF | Lecce | 2.88 | 69provisional | 2.21 | 57% | 39 | 021% 123% 219% 315% 410% 56% 6+7% |
| Enrique Pérez MuñozMID | Venezia | 2.73 | 70provisional | 2.13 | 57% | 13 | 018% 124% 222% 316% 410% 55% 6+5% |
| Antonino GalloDEF | Lecce | 2.02 | 84provisional | 1.88 | 53% | 66 | 019% 128% 224% 315% 48% 54% 6+2% |
| Antonio CandelaDEF | Venezia | 2.29 | 72provisional | 1.83 | 51% | 13 | 022% 127% 222% 314% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Santiago PierottiFWD | Lecce | 2.63 | 63provisional | 1.83 | 50% | 59 | 023% 127% 221% 314% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Tiago Gabriel Coelho OliveiraDEF | Lecce | 1.81 | 85provisional | 1.71 | 49% | 37 | 022% 129% 223% 314% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Oumar NgomMID | Lecce | 2.70 | 56provisional | 1.69 | 46% | 13 | 028% 126% 219% 312% 47% 54% 6+3% |
| Balthazar PierretMID | Lecce | 2.79 | 53provisional | 1.64 | 44% | 25 | 028% 128% 220% 312% 47% 53% 6+3% |
| Mikael Egill EllertssonMID | Venezia | 2.08 | 69provisional | 1.60 | 45% | 30 | 026% 129% 221% 313% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Michael SvobodaDEF | Venezianow at Brighton & Hove Albion | 1.71 | 82provisional | 1.56 | 44% | 15 | 025% 130% 223% 313% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Joël Marcel SchingtienneDEF | Venezia | 1.98 | 70provisional | 1.54 | 43% | 14 | 029% 129% 220% 312% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Lassana CoulibalyMID | Lecce | 1.77 | 76provisional | 1.49 | 42% | 67 | 027% 131% 222% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Fali CandéDEF | Venezia | 1.46 | 90provisional | 1.46 | 42% | 17 | 026% 132% 223% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Gianluca BusioMID | Venezia | 1.69 | 77provisional | 1.44 | 40% | 31 | 029% 131% 221% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Hans Nicolussi CavigliaMID | Venezianow at Parma | 1.56 | 82provisional | 1.42 | 40% | 33 | 028% 132% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| K. GasparDEF | Lecce | 1.47 | 85provisional | 1.38 | 39% | 44 | 029% 132% 221% 311% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Jamil SiebertDEF | Lecce | 1.52 | 81provisional | 1.36 | 38% | 19 | 030% 132% 221% 311% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Medon BerishaMID | Lecce | 2.26 | 54provisional | 1.35 | 37% | 21 | 033% 130% 219% 310% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Jay IdzesDEF | Venezia | 1.32 | 89provisional | 1.31 | 37% | 35 | 029% 134% 221% 310% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Francesco ZampanoMID | Venezia | 1.73 | 68provisional | 1.31 | 36% | 19 | 034% 130% 219% 310% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Marin SverkoDEF | Venezia | 1.63 | 70provisional | 1.27 | 35% | 13 | 035% 130% 219% 310% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Ridgeciano HapsDEF | Venezia | 2.06 | 55provisional | 1.25 | 34% | 17 | 037% 130% 217% 39% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Joseph Alfred DuncanMID | Venezia | 1.82 | 60provisional | 1.21 | 34% | 12 | 038% 128% 218% 39% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Giorgio AltareDEF | Venezia | 1.57 | 63provisional | 1.09 | 29% | 9 | 039% 132% 217% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Lameck BandaFWD | Lecce | 1.72 | 50provisional | 0.96 | 25% | 36 | 043% 132% 216% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Gaby JeanDEF | Lecce | 1.37 | 61provisional | 0.92 | 24% | 17 | 047% 129% 215% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Mohamed KabaMID | Lecce | 2.28 | 36provisional | 0.91 | 22% | 16 | 047% 130% 213% 35% 42% 51% 6+1% |
| Magnus AndersenMID | Venezia | 1.64 | 49provisional | 0.90 | 23% | 7 | 048% 128% 214% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Corrie NdabaDEF | Lecce | 1.90 | 39provisional | 0.82 | 21% | 7 | 053% 126% 212% 35% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Issa DoumbiaMID | Venezia | 1.63 | 39provisional | 0.71 | 17% | 11 | 056% 127% 211% 34% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Omri GandelmanMID | Lecce | 1.19 | 51provisional | 0.68 | 16% | 15 | 054% 130% 211% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Gaetano Pio OristanioMID | Venezianow at Torino | 0.89 | 63provisional | 0.63 | 14% | 32 | 056% 131% 210% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Konan Ignace Jocelyn N’driFWD | Lecce | 2.52 | 22provisional | 0.60 | 13% | 12 | 057% 130% 29% 32% 41% 5+0% |
| Nikola ŠtulićFWD | Lecce | 0.79 | 50provisional | 0.44 | 8% | 24 | 067% 125% 27% 31% 4+0% |
| John Yeboah ZamoraFWD | Venezia | 0.81 | 37provisional | 0.33 | 6% | 12 | 074% 120% 25% 31% 4+0% |
| D. FilaFWD | Venezia | 0.61 | 50provisional | 0.33 | 5% | 7 | 073% 122% 24% 31% 4+0% |
| Mirko MarićFWD | Venezia | 0.76 | 35provisional | 0.30 | 5% | 5 | 076% 118% 24% 31% 4+0% |
| Joel PohjanpaloFWD | Venezia | 0.32 | 81provisional | 0.29 | 4% | 19 | 075% 121% 23% 3+0% |
| Christian GytkjærFWD | Venezia | 0.68 | 26provisional | 0.20 | 3% | 7 | 083% 114% 22% 3+0% |
| Wladimiro FalconeGK | Lecce | 0.03 | 90provisional | 0.03 | — | 76 | 097% 1+3% |
| Ionuț Andrei RaduGK | Venezianow at Celta de Vigo | 0.01 | 90provisional | 0.01 | — | 15 | 099% 1+1% |
| Filip StankovicGK | Venezia | 0.01 | 86provisional | 0.01 | — | 15 | 099% 1+1% |
All 44 players shown, ranked by projection. Show fewer ↥ 5 of the 44 have since left the club — the squad is built from who has played for these teams, not from who is registered today, so they are shown rather than quietly dropped.
Shots44 playersHighest: Joel Pohjanpalo, 2.36 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel PohjanpaloFWD | Venezia | 2.64 | 81provisional | 2.36 | 66% | 19 | 012% 122% 224% 319% 412% 56% 6+5% |
| Hans Nicolussi CavigliaMID | Venezianow at Parma | 1.70 | 82provisional | 1.55 | 45% | 33 | 024% 131% 224% 313% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Gaetano Pio OristanioMID | Venezianow at Torino | 2.04 | 63provisional | 1.43 | 41% | 32 | 028% 132% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| D. FilaFWD | Venezia | 2.55 | 50provisional | 1.40 | 39% | 7 | 032% 129% 219% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Medon BerishaMID | Lecce | 2.15 | 54provisional | 1.29 | 36% | 21 | 033% 131% 219% 310% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| John Yeboah ZamoraFWD | Venezia | 3.07 | 37provisional | 1.27 | 33% | 12 | 038% 130% 216% 38% 44% 52% 6+2% |
| Gianluca BusioMID | Venezia | 1.47 | 77provisional | 1.25 | 35% | 31 | 032% 133% 221% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Lameck BandaFWD | Lecce | 2.22 | 50provisional | 1.24 | 34% | 36 | 033% 132% 219% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Mirko MarićFWD | Venezia | 3.05 | 35provisional | 1.20 | 31% | 5 | 043% 126% 214% 38% 45% 52% 6+2% |
| Nikola ŠtulićFWD | Lecce | 1.93 | 50provisional | 1.08 | 29% | 24 | 040% 131% 217% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 44 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 44 → 5 of the 44 have since left the club — the squad is built from who has played for these teams, not from who is registered today, so they are shown rather than quietly dropped.
Fouls won44 playersHighest: Gaetano Pio Oristanio, 2.01 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaetano Pio OristanioMID | Venezianow at Torino | 2.87 | 63provisional | 2.01 | 56% | 32 | 018% 126% 223% 316% 49% 55% 6+3% |
| Alessio ZerbinMID | Venezianow at Frosinone | 1.80 | 84provisional | 1.69 | 49% | 17 | 022% 129% 224% 314% 47% 53% 6+1% |
| Lameck BandaFWD | Lecce | 2.86 | 50provisional | 1.60 | 45% | 36 | 026% 130% 221% 312% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Lassana CoulibalyMID | Lecce | 1.68 | 76provisional | 1.41 | 40% | 67 | 028% 132% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Gianluca BusioMID | Venezia | 1.64 | 77provisional | 1.39 | 40% | 31 | 028% 132% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Mikael Egill EllertssonMID | Venezia | 1.65 | 69provisional | 1.26 | 35% | 30 | 032% 132% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Enrique Pérez MuñozMID | Venezia | 1.46 | 70provisional | 1.14 | 31% | 13 | 036% 133% 219% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Danilo Filipe Melo VeigaDEF | Lecce | 1.45 | 69provisional | 1.12 | 31% | 39 | 038% 131% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Fali CandéDEF | Venezia | 1.11 | 90provisional | 1.11 | 30% | 17 | 034% 136% 220% 38% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Hans Nicolussi CavigliaMID | Venezianow at Parma | 1.22 | 82provisional | 1.11 | 30% | 33 | 035% 135% 219% 38% 42% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 44 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 44 → 5 of the 44 have since left the club — the squad is built from who has played for these teams, not from who is registered today, so they are shown rather than quietly dropped.
Cards44 playersHighest: Enrique Pérez Muñoz, 0.22 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow, second yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card". The trends column counts the same thing.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrique Pérez MuñozMID | Venezia | 0.28 | 70provisional | 0.22 | 19% | 13 | 081% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Alessio ZerbinMID | Venezianow at Frosinone | 0.23 | 84provisional | 0.21 | 19% | 17 | 081% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Fali CandéDEF | Venezia | 0.21 | 90provisional | 0.21 | 19% | 17 | 081% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Danilo Filipe Melo VeigaDEF | Lecce | 0.25 | 69provisional | 0.19 | 17% | 39 | 083% 115% 22% 3+0% |
| Jay IdzesDEF | Venezia | 0.18 | 89provisional | 0.18 | 17% | 35 | 083% 115% 2+1% |
| Hans Nicolussi CavigliaMID | Venezianow at Parma | 0.20 | 82provisional | 0.18 | 16% | 33 | 084% 115% 2+1% |
| Ylber RamadaniMID | Lecce | 0.20 | 76provisional | 0.17 | 16% | 61 | 084% 114% 2+1% |
| Lameck BandaFWD | Lecce | 0.31 | 50provisional | 0.17 | 16% | 36 | 084% 114% 21% 3+0% |
| Jamil SiebertDEF | Lecce | 0.19 | 81provisional | 0.17 | 16% | 19 | 084% 114% 2+1% |
| Tiago Gabriel Coelho OliveiraDEF | Lecce | 0.16 | 85provisional | 0.16 | 14% | 37 | 086% 113% 2+1% |
10 of 44 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 44 → 5 of the 44 have since left the club — the squad is built from who has played for these teams, not from who is registered today, so they are shown rather than quietly dropped.
Saves3 playersHighest: Wladimiro Falcone, 3.20 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wladimiro FalconeGK | Lecce | 3.20 | 90provisional | 3.20 | 59% | 76 | 06% 115% 220% 320% 416% 511% 6+13% |
| Filip StankovicGK | Venezia | 2.74 | 86provisional | 2.60 | 47% | 15 | 09% 120% 224% 320% 413% 57% 6+7% |
| Ionuț Andrei RaduGK | Venezianow at Celta de Vigo | 2.46 | 90provisional | 2.46 | 43% | 15 | 011% 122% 224% 319% 412% 57% 6+5% |
1 of the 3 have since left the club — the squad is built from who has played for these teams, not from who is registered today, so they are shown rather than quietly dropped.
1 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.