Serie A · Italy
NapolivComo
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
23.2
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260815-1512 · Tackles v20260815-1512 · Shots v20260815-1512 · Fouls won v20260815-1512 · Cards v20260815-1512 · Saves v20260815-1512
Model projections
Fouls52 playersHighest: Nico Paz, 1.44 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nico PazMID | Como | 1.63 | 80provisional | 1.44 | 42% | 63 | 026% 132% 223% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Diego CarlosDEF | Como | 1.69 | 72provisional | 1.35 | 39% | 24 | 029% 133% 222% 311% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Edoardo GoldanigaDEF | Como | 1.57 | 75provisional | 1.31 | 38% | 28 | 032% 130% 221% 311% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 1.97 | 59provisional | 1.29 | 37% | 20 | 035% 128% 219% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Juan JesusDEF | Napoli | 1.62 | 71provisional | 1.27 | 36% | 32 | 033% 130% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Antonio VergaraMID | Napoli | 2.19 | 51provisional | 1.25 | 36% | 8 | 040% 124% 218% 310% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 1.25 | 89provisional | 1.23 | 35% | 63 | 030% 136% 222% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Alessandro BuongiornoDEF | Napoli | 1.35 | 81provisional | 1.22 | 34% | 50 | 032% 134% 221% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Romelu LukakuFWD | Napoli | 1.54 | 71provisional | 1.21 | 35% | 35 | 034% 132% 220% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Rasmus HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 1.25 | 84provisional | 1.17 | 32% | 32 | 032% 136% 221% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Tackles52 playersHighest: Alieu Fadera, 1.24 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 1.90 | 59provisional | 1.24 | 34% | 20 | 038% 128% 218% 39% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Nico PazMID | Como | 1.35 | 80provisional | 1.20 | 33% | 63 | 034% 133% 219% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 1.09 | 89provisional | 1.07 | 29% | 63 | 037% 135% 218% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Máximo PerroneMID | Como | 1.30 | 74provisional | 1.07 | 29% | 57 | 038% 133% 218% 37% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Ignace Van der BremptDEF | Como | 1.72 | 55provisional | 1.04 | 28% | 25 | 044% 128% 215% 38% 43% 51% 6+1% |
| Mathías OliveraDEF | Napoli | 1.41 | 66provisional | 1.03 | 28% | 46 | 041% 131% 216% 37% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Jacobo RamónDEF | Como | 1.03 | 86provisional | 0.98 | 26% | 32 | 040% 134% 217% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Álex ValleDEF | Como | 1.20 | 71provisional | 0.95 | 25% | 36 | 044% 131% 216% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Juan JesusDEF | Napoli | 1.16 | 71provisional | 0.91 | 24% | 32 | 045% 131% 215% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Maxence CaqueretMID | Como | 1.48 | 54provisional | 0.89 | 23% | 38 | 045% 132% 215% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Shots52 playersHighest: Nico Paz, 2.34 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nico PazMID | Como | 2.64 | 80provisional | 2.34 | 64% | 63 | 014% 122% 223% 318% 412% 56% 6+5% |
| Scott McTominayMID | Napoli | 2.37 | 86provisional | 2.25 | 63% | 65 | 013% 124% 225% 318% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Rasmus HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 1.96 | 84provisional | 1.83 | 53% | 32 | 018% 129% 225% 316% 48% 53% 6+2% |
| Alisson SantosFWD | Napoli | 2.49 | 60provisional | 1.66 | 47% | 11 | 024% 129% 222% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Romelu LukakuFWD | Napoli | 1.98 | 71provisional | 1.56 | 45% | 35 | 027% 128% 222% 313% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Kevin De BruyneMID | Napoli | 1.96 | 65provisional | 1.42 | 40% | 17 | 027% 133% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Assane DiaoFWD | Como | 1.72 | 73provisional | 1.39 | 40% | 31 | 027% 133% 222% 311% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Matteo PolitanoFWD | Napoli | 1.74 | 71provisional | 1.38 | 39% | 62 | 029% 132% 221% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Anastasios DouvikasFWD | Como | 2.07 | 56provisional | 1.29 | 36% | 37 | 034% 131% 219% 310% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Jesús RodríguezFWD | Como | 1.91 | 56provisional | 1.18 | 32% | 26 | 036% 132% 218% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Fouls won52 playersHighest: Assane Diao, 2.49 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assane DiaoFWD | Como | 3.07 | 73provisional | 2.49 | 68% | 31 | 011% 121% 223% 319% 412% 57% 6+6% |
| Scott McTominayMID | Napoli | 2.19 | 86provisional | 2.08 | 59% | 65 | 015% 126% 225% 317% 410% 55% 6+3% |
| Rasmus HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 1.86 | 84provisional | 1.73 | 50% | 32 | 020% 130% 225% 315% 47% 53% 6+1% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 2.57 | 59provisional | 1.68 | 46% | 20 | 029% 125% 220% 313% 48% 54% 6+2% |
| Antonio VergaraMID | Napoli | 2.68 | 51provisional | 1.52 | 42% | 8 | 036% 122% 218% 312% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Martin BaturinaMID | Como | 2.26 | 55provisional | 1.38 | 38% | 21 | 034% 128% 218% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Stanislav LobotkaMID | Napoli | 1.43 | 79provisional | 1.26 | 36% | 61 | 031% 134% 221% 310% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 1.25 | 89provisional | 1.23 | 35% | 63 | 030% 135% 221% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Anastasios DouvikasFWD | Como | 1.85 | 56provisional | 1.15 | 31% | 37 | 037% 131% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Jayden AddaiFWD | Como | 1.78 | 57provisional | 1.14 | 31% | 10 | 036% 133% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Cards52 playersHighest: Edoardo Goldaniga, 0.25 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow, second yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card". The trends column counts the same thing.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edoardo GoldanigaDEF | Como | 0.30 | 75provisional | 0.25 | 22% | 28 | 078% 119% 23% 3+0% |
| Jacobo RamónDEF | Como | 0.25 | 86provisional | 0.24 | 21% | 32 | 079% 119% 22% 3+0% |
| Diego CarlosDEF | Como | 0.29 | 72provisional | 0.23 | 21% | 24 | 079% 118% 22% 3+0% |
| Juan JesusDEF | Napoli | 0.29 | 71provisional | 0.22 | 20% | 32 | 080% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Ivan SmolcicDEF | Como | 0.30 | 62provisional | 0.20 | 18% | 29 | 082% 116% 22% 3+0% |
| Máximo PerroneMID | Como | 0.24 | 74provisional | 0.20 | 18% | 57 | 082% 116% 22% 3+0% |
| Jayden AddaiFWD | Como | 0.26 | 57provisional | 0.17 | 15% | 10 | 085% 114% 2+1% |
| Álex ValleDEF | Como | 0.20 | 71provisional | 0.16 | 14% | 36 | 086% 113% 2+1% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 0.23 | 59provisional | 0.15 | 14% | 20 | 086% 112% 2+1% |
| Assane DiaoFWD | Como | 0.18 | 73provisional | 0.15 | 14% | 31 | 086% 113% 2+1% |
| Maxence CaqueretMID | Como | 0.24 | 54provisional | 0.15 | 13% | 38 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Nico PazMID | Como | 0.16 | 80provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 63 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Alessandro BuongiornoDEF | Napoli | 0.16 | 81provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 50 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 0.14 | 89provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 63 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Ignace Van der BremptDEF | Como | 0.23 | 55provisional | 0.14 | 13% | 25 | 087% 112% 2+1% |
| Jesús RodríguezFWD | Como | 0.22 | 56provisional | 0.13 | 12% | 26 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Marc Oliver KempfDEF | Como | 0.16 | 76provisional | 0.13 | 12% | 58 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Frank AnguissaMID | Napoli | 0.15 | 78provisional | 0.13 | 12% | 50 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Alberto DossenaDEF | Como | 0.14 | 79provisional | 0.13 | 12% | 21 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Sam BeukemaDEF | Napoli | 0.16 | 70provisional | 0.13 | 12% | 21 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Alberto MorenoDEF | Como | 0.16 | 69provisional | 0.13 | 12% | 36 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Amir RrahmaniDEF | Napoli | 0.13 | 88provisional | 0.12 | 12% | 59 | 088% 111% 2+1% |
| Mathías OliveraDEF | Napoli | 0.17 | 66provisional | 0.12 | 11% | 46 | 089% 111% 2+1% |
| Lucas Da CunhaMID | Como | 0.15 | 75provisional | 0.12 | 11% | 66 | 089% 111% 2+1% |
| Antonio VergaraMID | Napoli | 0.21 | 51provisional | 0.12 | 11% | 8 | 089% 110% 2+1% |
| Sergi RobertoMID | Como | 0.26 | 37provisional | 0.11 | 10% | 15 | 090% 19% 2+1% |
| Scott McTominayMID | Napoli | 0.11 | 86provisional | 0.11 | 10% | 65 | 090% 110% 2+1% |
| Romelu LukakuFWD | Napoli | 0.13 | 71provisional | 0.10 | 10% | 35 | 090% 19% 2+1% |
| David NeresFWD | Napoli | 0.18 | 50provisional | 0.10 | 9% | 25 | 091% 19% 2+1% |
| Stefan PoschDEF | Como | 0.31 | 27provisional | 0.09 | 9% | 5 | 091% 18% 2+1% |
| Stanislav LobotkaMID | Napoli | 0.11 | 79provisional | 0.09 | 9% | 61 | 091% 18% 2+0% |
| Álvaro MorataFWD | Como | 0.23 | 36provisional | 0.09 | 9% | 14 | 091% 18% 2+1% |
| Luca MazzitelliMID | Como | 0.24 | 33provisional | 0.09 | 8% | 3 | 092% 18% 2+1% |
| Billy GilmourMID | Napoli | 0.16 | 46provisional | 0.08 | 8% | 26 | 092% 17% 2+0% |
| Alisson SantosFWD | Napoli | 0.12 | 60provisional | 0.08 | 8% | 11 | 092% 18% 2+0% |
| Matteo PolitanoFWD | Napoli | 0.10 | 71provisional | 0.08 | 8% | 62 | 092% 17% 2+0% |
| Rasmus HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 0.09 | 84provisional | 0.08 | 8% | 32 | 092% 17% 2+0% |
| Eljif ElmasMID | Napoli | 0.13 | 54provisional | 0.08 | 7% | 23 | 093% 17% 2+0% |
| Lorenzo LuccaFWD | Napoli | 0.26 | 25provisional | 0.07 | 7% | 4 | 093% 16% 2+1% |
| Anastasios DouvikasFWD | Como | 0.11 | 56provisional | 0.07 | 7% | 37 | 093% 16% 2+0% |
| Pasquale MazzocchiDEF | Napoli | 0.21 | 28provisional | 0.06 | 6% | 10 | 094% 16% 2+0% |
| Kevin De BruyneMID | Napoli | 0.09 | 65provisional | 0.06 | 6% | 17 | 094% 16% 2+0% |
| Noa LangFWD | Napoli | 0.15 | 37provisional | 0.06 | 6% | 9 | 094% 16% 2+0% |
| Leonardo SpinazzolaDEF | Napoli | 0.09 | 58provisional | 0.06 | 6% | 43 | 094% 15% 2+0% |
| Alex MeretGK | Napoli | 0.05 | 89provisional | 0.05 | 5% | 45 | 095% 15% 2+0% |
| Martin BaturinaMID | Como | 0.08 | 55provisional | 0.05 | 5% | 21 | 095% 15% 2+0% |
| GiovaneFWD | Napoli | 0.16 | 28provisional | 0.05 | 5% | 3 | 095% 15% 2+0% |
| Nicolas KühnFWD | Como | 0.14 | 29provisional | 0.05 | 4% | 9 | 096% 14% 2+0% |
| Vanja Milinković-SavićGK | Napoli | 0.04 | 90provisional | 0.04 | 4% | 27 | 096% 1+4% |
| Cyril NgongeFWD | Napoli | 0.31 | 12provisional | 0.04 | 4% | 1 | 096% 14% 2+0% |
| Alessandro GabrielloniFWD | Como | 0.28 | 11provisional | 0.03 | 3% | 1 | 097% 1+3% |
| Jean ButezGK | Como | 0.02 | 89provisional | 0.02 | 2% | 57 | 098% 1+2% |
All 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show fewer ↥
Saves3 playersHighest: Jean Butez, 2.82 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean ButezGK | Como | 2.85 | 89provisional | 2.82 | 52% | 57 | 08% 118% 222% 320% 414% 59% 6+9% |
| Vanja Milinković-SavićGK | Napoli | 2.30 | 90provisional | 2.30 | 40% | 27 | 012% 124% 225% 319% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Alex MeretGK | Napoli | 2.12 | 89provisional | 2.09 | 34% | 45 | 014% 126% 225% 317% 410% 55% 6+3% |
1 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.