Serie A · Italy
NapolivComo
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260813-1451 · Tackles v20260813-1451 · Shots v20260813-1451 · Fouls won v20260813-1451 · Cards v20260813-1451 · Saves v20260813-1451
Model projections
Fouls52 playersHighest: Nicolás Paz Martínez, 1.46 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolás Paz MartínezMID | Como | 1.65 | 80provisional | 1.46 | 42% | 63 | 026% 132% 223% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Diego Carlos Santos SilvaDEF | Como | 1.71 | 72provisional | 1.37 | 39% | 24 | 028% 133% 222% 311% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Edoardo GoldanigaDEF | Como | 1.59 | 75provisional | 1.33 | 38% | 28 | 032% 130% 221% 311% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 1.99 | 59provisional | 1.30 | 37% | 20 | 035% 128% 219% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Juan Guilherme Nunes JesusDEF | Napoli | 1.63 | 71provisional | 1.28 | 37% | 32 | 033% 130% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Antonio VergaraMID | Napoli | 2.21 | 51provisional | 1.26 | 36% | 8 | 040% 124% 218% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 1.26 | 89provisional | 1.25 | 35% | 63 | 029% 135% 222% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Alessandro BuongiornoDEF | Napoli | 1.37 | 81provisional | 1.23 | 35% | 50 | 031% 134% 221% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Romelu Lukaku MenamaFWD | Napoli | 1.55 | 71provisional | 1.22 | 35% | 35 | 034% 132% 221% 310% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Rasmus Winther HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 1.26 | 84provisional | 1.18 | 33% | 32 | 032% 135% 221% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Tackles52 playersHighest: Nicolás Paz Martínez, 1.96 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolás Paz MartínezMID | Como | 2.21 | 80provisional | 1.96 | 55% | 63 | 019% 126% 223% 315% 49% 54% 6+3% |
| Mathías Olivera MiramontesDEF | Napoli | 2.61 | 66provisional | 1.90 | 51% | 46 | 023% 126% 220% 314% 48% 54% 6+4% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 2.79 | 59provisional | 1.82 | 48% | 20 | 028% 124% 219% 313% 48% 54% 6+4% |
| Álex Valle GómezDEF | Como | 2.28 | 71provisional | 1.80 | 50% | 36 | 025% 126% 221% 314% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 1.79 | 89provisional | 1.77 | 51% | 63 | 020% 129% 224% 315% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Ignace Van Der BremptDEF | Como | 2.76 | 55provisional | 1.68 | 44% | 25 | 031% 125% 218% 312% 47% 54% 6+3% |
| Juan Guilherme Nunes JesusDEF | Napoli | 2.11 | 71provisional | 1.66 | 46% | 32 | 028% 126% 220% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Maximo PerroneMID | Como | 1.96 | 74provisional | 1.62 | 46% | 57 | 025% 130% 222% 313% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Jacobo Ramón NaverosDEF | Como | 1.67 | 86provisional | 1.59 | 45% | 32 | 024% 131% 223% 313% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Maxence CaqueretMID | Como | 2.55 | 54provisional | 1.52 | 42% | 38 | 028% 130% 220% 312% 46% 53% 6+2% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Shots52 playersHighest: Nicolás Paz Martínez, 2.38 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolás Paz MartínezMID | Como | 2.69 | 80provisional | 2.38 | 65% | 63 | 013% 122% 223% 318% 412% 57% 6+5% |
| Scott McTominayMID | Napoli | 2.42 | 86provisional | 2.30 | 64% | 65 | 012% 123% 224% 319% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Rasmus Winther HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 2.01 | 84provisional | 1.87 | 54% | 32 | 018% 128% 225% 316% 48% 53% 6+2% |
| Alisson de Almeida SantosFWD | Napoli | 2.54 | 60provisional | 1.69 | 47% | 11 | 024% 129% 222% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Romelu Lukaku MenamaFWD | Napoli | 2.02 | 71provisional | 1.60 | 46% | 35 | 026% 128% 222% 313% 46% 53% 6+1% |
| Kevin De BruyneMID | Napoli | 2.00 | 65provisional | 1.45 | 41% | 17 | 026% 132% 222% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Assane Diao DiaouneFWD | Como | 1.75 | 73provisional | 1.42 | 41% | 31 | 026% 133% 223% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Matteo PolitanoFWD | Napoli | 1.78 | 71provisional | 1.41 | 40% | 62 | 029% 131% 222% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Anastasios DouvikasFWD | Como | 2.10 | 56provisional | 1.31 | 36% | 37 | 033% 131% 219% 310% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Jesús Rodríguez CaraballoFWD | Como | 1.94 | 56provisional | 1.20 | 33% | 26 | 035% 132% 219% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Fouls won52 playersHighest: Assane Diao Diaoune, 2.53 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assane Diao DiaouneFWD | Como | 3.11 | 73provisional | 2.53 | 68% | 31 | 011% 121% 223% 319% 413% 57% 6+6% |
| Scott McTominayMID | Napoli | 2.20 | 86provisional | 2.09 | 60% | 65 | 015% 126% 225% 318% 410% 55% 6+3% |
| Rasmus Winther HøjlundFWD | Napoli | 1.87 | 84provisional | 1.74 | 51% | 32 | 020% 130% 225% 315% 47% 53% 6+1% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 2.60 | 59provisional | 1.70 | 47% | 20 | 028% 125% 220% 314% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Antonio VergaraMID | Napoli | 2.69 | 51provisional | 1.53 | 42% | 8 | 036% 122% 218% 312% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Martin BaturinaMID | Como | 2.30 | 55provisional | 1.40 | 38% | 21 | 033% 128% 218% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Stanislav LobotkaMID | Napoli | 1.44 | 79provisional | 1.27 | 36% | 61 | 030% 134% 221% 310% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Giovanni Di LorenzoDEF | Napoli | 1.26 | 89provisional | 1.24 | 35% | 63 | 030% 135% 221% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Anastasios DouvikasFWD | Como | 1.88 | 56provisional | 1.17 | 32% | 37 | 037% 131% 218% 39% 43% 51% 6+1% |
| Jayden AddaiFWD | Como | 1.81 | 57provisional | 1.15 | 31% | 10 | 036% 133% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Cards52 playersHighest: Edoardo Goldaniga, 0.25 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow, second yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card". The trends column counts the same thing.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edoardo GoldanigaDEF | Como | 0.30 | 75provisional | 0.25 | 22% | 28 | 078% 119% 23% 3+0% |
| Jacobo Ramón NaverosDEF | Como | 0.26 | 86provisional | 0.24 | 22% | 32 | 078% 119% 22% 3+0% |
| Diego Carlos Santos SilvaDEF | Como | 0.29 | 72provisional | 0.24 | 21% | 24 | 079% 118% 22% 3+0% |
| Juan Guilherme Nunes JesusDEF | Napoli | 0.29 | 71provisional | 0.23 | 20% | 32 | 080% 117% 22% 3+0% |
| Ivan SmolčićDEF | Como | 0.30 | 62provisional | 0.21 | 18% | 29 | 082% 116% 22% 3+0% |
| Maximo PerroneMID | Como | 0.24 | 74provisional | 0.20 | 18% | 57 | 082% 116% 22% 3+0% |
| Jayden AddaiFWD | Como | 0.27 | 57provisional | 0.17 | 15% | 10 | 085% 114% 21% 3+0% |
| Álex Valle GómezDEF | Como | 0.20 | 71provisional | 0.16 | 14% | 36 | 086% 113% 2+1% |
| Alieu FaderaFWD | Como | 0.23 | 59provisional | 0.15 | 14% | 20 | 086% 112% 2+1% |
| Assane Diao DiaouneFWD | Como | 0.18 | 73provisional | 0.15 | 14% | 31 | 086% 113% 2+1% |
10 of 52 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 52 →
Saves3 playersHighest: Jean Butez, 2.79 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean ButezGK | Como | 2.81 | 89provisional | 2.79 | 51% | 57 | 08% 118% 223% 320% 414% 59% 6+8% |
| Vanja Milinković SavićGK | Napoli | 2.27 | 90provisional | 2.27 | 39% | 27 | 012% 124% 225% 318% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Alex MeretGK | Napoli | 2.09 | 89provisional | 2.06 | 34% | 45 | 015% 126% 225% 317% 49% 54% 6+3% |
1 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.