La Liga · Spain
Celta de VigovAthletic Club
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260813-1451 · Tackles v20260813-1451 · Shots v20260813-1451 · Fouls won v20260813-1451 · Cards v20260813-1451 · Saves v20260813-1451
Model projections
Fouls43 playersHighest: Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta Etxeberria, 1.60 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta EtxeberriaMID | Athletic Club | 2.31 | 62provisional | 1.60 | 46% | 56 | 023% 131% 224% 313% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Mikel Jauregizar AlbonigaMID | Athletic Club | 1.71 | 73provisional | 1.38 | 40% | 62 | 028% 132% 222% 311% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Benat Prados DíazMID | Athletic Club | 2.07 | 57provisional | 1.30 | 37% | 25 | 032% 132% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Yoel Lago AmilDEF | Celta de Vigo | 1.50 | 78provisional | 1.29 | 37% | 18 | 031% 132% 222% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Gorka Guruzeta RodríguezFWD | Athletic Club | 1.96 | 59provisional | 1.29 | 36% | 58 | 032% 132% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Alejandro Rego MoraMID | Athletic Club | 2.52 | 44provisional | 1.22 | 33% | 16 | 037% 131% 217% 39% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Daniel Vivian MorenoDEF | Athletic Club | 1.14 | 82provisional | 1.04 | 28% | 59 | 037% 135% 219% 37% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Álvaro Djaló Dias FernandesFWD | Athletic Club | 2.37 | 39provisional | 1.02 | 27% | 10 | 040% 133% 217% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Moriba Kourouma KouroumaMID | Celta de Vigo | 1.36 | 67provisional | 1.01 | 27% | 54 | 040% 132% 217% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Maroan Sannadi HarrouchFWD | Athletic Club | 2.26 | 40provisional | 1.00 | 26% | 13 | 043% 131% 215% 37% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 43 →
Tackles43 playersHighest: Moriba Kourouma Kourouma, 2.27 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moriba Kourouma KouroumaMID | Celta de Vigo | 3.04 | 67provisional | 2.27 | 58% | 54 | 019% 123% 220% 315% 410% 56% 6+7% |
| Mikel Jauregizar AlbonigaMID | Athletic Club | 2.53 | 73provisional | 2.04 | 56% | 62 | 019% 125% 222% 316% 49% 55% 6+4% |
| Andoni Gorosabel EspinosaDEF | Athletic Club | 2.49 | 65provisional | 1.79 | 48% | 35 | 026% 126% 220% 313% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Benat Prados DíazMID | Athletic Club | 2.83 | 57provisional | 1.78 | 48% | 25 | 024% 127% 221% 313% 48% 54% 6+3% |
| Francisco José Beltrán PeinadoMID | Celta de Vigo | 2.22 | 69provisional | 1.71 | 47% | 15 | 025% 128% 221% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta EtxeberriaMID | Athletic Club | 2.32 | 62provisional | 1.60 | 45% | 56 | 025% 130% 222% 313% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Yoel Lago AmilDEF | Celta de Vigo | 1.76 | 78provisional | 1.52 | 43% | 18 | 028% 129% 221% 312% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Miguel Román GonzálezMID | Celta de Vigo | 1.93 | 69provisional | 1.48 | 41% | 14 | 032% 127% 219% 312% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Daniel Vivian MorenoDEF | Athletic Club | 1.61 | 82provisional | 1.47 | 42% | 59 | 027% 131% 222% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Carlos Domínguez CáceresDEF | Celta de Vigo | 1.87 | 66provisional | 1.38 | 38% | 22 | 033% 129% 219% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
10 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 43 →
Shots43 playersHighest: Gorka Guruzeta Rodríguez, 1.65 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gorka Guruzeta RodríguezFWD | Athletic Club | 2.50 | 59provisional | 1.65 | 46% | 58 | 025% 129% 222% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Iñaki Williams ArthuerFWD | Athletic Club | 1.85 | 74provisional | 1.53 | 44% | 61 | 025% 131% 223% 312% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Nicholas Williams ArthuerFWD | Athletic Club | 2.01 | 68provisional | 1.52 | 43% | 50 | 026% 131% 222% 312% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Oihan Sancet TirapuMID | Athletic Club | 2.18 | 60provisional | 1.46 | 41% | 49 | 027% 132% 222% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Ferran Jutlgà BlancFWD | Celta de Vigo | 2.10 | 55provisional | 1.29 | 36% | 23 | 033% 131% 220% 310% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Alejandro Berenguer RemiroFWD | Athletic Club | 1.68 | 67provisional | 1.26 | 35% | 58 | 032% 133% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Borja Iglesias QuintasFWD | Celta de Vigo | 2.04 | 54provisional | 1.22 | 34% | 50 | 036% 130% 218% 39% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Iago Aspas JuncalFWD | Celta de Vigo | 2.18 | 47provisional | 1.13 | 30% | 34 | 041% 129% 216% 38% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Maroan Sannadi HarrouchFWD | Athletic Club | 2.29 | 40provisional | 1.02 | 26% | 13 | 043% 131% 215% 37% 43% 51% 6+1% |
| Pablo Durán FernándezFWD | Celta de Vigo | 1.84 | 50provisional | 1.02 | 27% | 37 | 043% 130% 216% 37% 43% 51% 6+0% |
10 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 43 →
Fouls won43 playersHighest: Moriba Kourouma Kourouma, 1.73 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moriba Kourouma KouroumaMID | Celta de Vigo | 2.32 | 67provisional | 1.73 | 48% | 54 | 025% 127% 221% 314% 47% 54% 6+2% |
| Nicholas Williams ArthuerFWD | Athletic Club | 1.52 | 68provisional | 1.15 | 32% | 50 | 035% 133% 219% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Maroan Sannadi HarrouchFWD | Athletic Club | 2.54 | 40provisional | 1.13 | 30% | 13 | 040% 131% 216% 38% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Ferran Jutlgà BlancFWD | Celta de Vigo | 1.83 | 55provisional | 1.13 | 31% | 23 | 037% 132% 218% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Williot SwedbergFWD | Celta de Vigo | 2.33 | 43provisional | 1.11 | 30% | 36 | 038% 132% 217% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Mikel Jauregizar AlbonigaMID | Athletic Club | 1.32 | 73provisional | 1.07 | 29% | 62 | 037% 134% 218% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Borja Iglesias QuintasFWD | Celta de Vigo | 1.75 | 54provisional | 1.05 | 28% | 50 | 041% 131% 217% 37% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Alejandro Berenguer RemiroFWD | Athletic Club | 1.39 | 67provisional | 1.04 | 28% | 58 | 039% 134% 218% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Iñaki Williams ArthuerFWD | Athletic Club | 1.22 | 74provisional | 1.00 | 27% | 61 | 039% 134% 217% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta EtxeberriaMID | Athletic Club | 1.41 | 62provisional | 0.97 | 26% | 56 | 040% 135% 217% 36% 42% 50% 6+0% |
10 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 43 →
Cards43 playersHighest: Yoel Lago Amil, 0.24 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow, second yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card". The trends column counts the same thing.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoel Lago AmilDEF | Celta de Vigo | 0.28 | 78provisional | 0.24 | 21% | 18 | 079% 118% 22% 3+0% |
| Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta EtxeberriaMID | Athletic Club | 0.34 | 62provisional | 0.24 | 21% | 56 | 079% 118% 22% 3+0% |
| Daniel Vivian MorenoDEF | Athletic Club | 0.21 | 82provisional | 0.19 | 17% | 59 | 083% 116% 22% 3+0% |
| Marcos Alonso MendozaDEF | Celta de Vigo | 0.19 | 86provisional | 0.19 | 17% | 62 | 083% 115% 21% 3+0% |
| Aitor Paredes CasamichanaDEF | Athletic Club | 0.20 | 82provisional | 0.18 | 16% | 39 | 084% 115% 2+1% |
| Alejandro Rego MoraMID | Athletic Club | 0.36 | 44provisional | 0.18 | 16% | 16 | 084% 114% 22% 3+0% |
| Moriba Kourouma KouroumaMID | Celta de Vigo | 0.24 | 67provisional | 0.18 | 16% | 54 | 084% 114% 21% 3+0% |
| Benat Prados DíazMID | Athletic Club | 0.27 | 57provisional | 0.17 | 15% | 25 | 085% 114% 21% 3+0% |
| Andoni Gorosabel EspinosaDEF | Athletic Club | 0.22 | 65provisional | 0.16 | 15% | 35 | 085% 113% 2+1% |
| Javier Rodríguez GalianoDEF | Celta de Vigo | 0.19 | 74provisional | 0.15 | 14% | 61 | 086% 113% 2+1% |
10 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 43 →
Saves2 playersHighest: Unai Simón Mendibil, 2.90 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unai Simón MendibilGK | Athletic Club | 2.90 | 90provisional | 2.90 | 53% | 58 | 07% 117% 222% 320% 415% 59% 6+9% |
| Ionuț Andrei RaduGK | Celta de Vigo | 2.61 | 90provisional | 2.61 | 47% | 38 | 09% 120% 224% 320% 413% 57% 6+7% |
1 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.