Championship · England
Wolverhampton WanderersvStoke City
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260811-1858 · Tackles v20260811-1858 · Shots v20260811-1858 · Shots on target v20260811-1905 · Fouls won v20260811-1858 · Cards v20260811-1905 · Saves v20260812-1340
Model projections
Fouls43 playersHighest: Sorba Thomas, 1.17 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
- Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.17
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.21
033%135%220%38%43%51%6+0% - Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.13
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 1.24
034%135%220%38%43%51%6+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.01
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.35
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Róbert Boženíkprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 1.01
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 2.28
046%128%214%37%43%51%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.17
041%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Marshall Nyasha Munetsiprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.19
042%133%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Toluwalase Emmanuel Arokodareprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.91
050%127%213%36%43%51%6+1% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.63
048%129%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.33
047%130%215%36%42%51%6+0% - André Trindade da Costa Netoprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.89
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.04
043%134%216%35%41%5+0% - Jhon Adolfo Arias Andradeprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.87
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.60
049%128%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Sam Gallagherprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 41
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.91
047%132%214%35%42%51%6+0% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.31
050%130%214%35%42%50%6+0% - Hee-Chan Hwangprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.62
051%128%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.01
048%133%214%34%41%5+0% - Mateus Manéprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.09
051%130%213%35%41%5+0% - Milan Smitprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.66
055%127%212%35%42%50%6+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 1.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.85
050%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.21
053%129%212%34%41%5+0% - Ladislav Krejčíprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.72
- O 1.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.77
050%134%212%33%41%5+0%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.
Tackles43 playersHighest: André Trindade da Costa Neto, 1.97 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
- André Trindade da Costa Netoprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.97
- O 1.5
- 57%
- Model /90
- 2.29
017%126%225%317%49%54%6+2% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 1.85
- O 1.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 2.74
025%124%220%314%49%55%6+3% - Santiago Ignacio Bueno Sciuttoprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.63
- O 1.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 2.01
027%126%222%314%47%53%6+1% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 1.63
- O 1.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 2.06
023%129%223%314%46%52%6+1% - Marshall Nyasha Munetsiprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 1.56
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 1.94
025%130%223%313%46%52%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.53
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 1.81
025%130%223%313%46%52%6+1% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 1.50
- O 1.5
- 43%
- Model /90
- 2.43
030%127%220%312%46%53%6+1% - Yerson Mosqueraprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 1.43
- O 1.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 1.60
026%133%223%312%45%51%6+0% - Emmanuel Agbadouprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.43
- O 1.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 1.53
025%134%224%312%44%51%6+0% - Maksym Talovierovprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.39
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 1.71
028%132%222%311%45%51%6+1% - Mateus Manéprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 1.38
- O 1.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 1.94
032%129%220%311%45%52%6+1% - Tote António Gomesprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 1.37
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 1.53
027%133%223%311%44%51%6+0% - Jackson Tchatchouaprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 59
- Proj.
- 1.35
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 2.04
033%129%219%311%45%52%6+1% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 1.56
029%133%222%311%44%51%6+0% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.76
031%131%221%311%44%51%6+1% - Ben Wilmotprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 1.31
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.39
028%135%223%310%43%51%6+0% - Aaron Cresswellprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.30
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.46
028%135%222%310%43%51%6+0% - Hugo Buenoprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.29
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.72
033%130%220%310%44%51%6+0% - Angel Gomesprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 39
- Proj.
- 1.29
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 2.95
036%128%218%310%45%52%6+1% - Ladislav Krejčíprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 1.27
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.36
028%135%222%310%43%51%6+0%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots43 playersHighest: Adam Armstrong, 2.15 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
- Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 2.15
- O 1.5
- 60%
- Model /90
- 2.36
015%125%224%317%410%55%6+4% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.68
- O 1.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 1.74
022%130%223%314%47%53%6+2% - Toluwalase Emmanuel Arokodareprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 1.54
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 3.25
037%126%214%39%46%54%6+5% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.48
- O 1.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 1.96
029%130%220%311%45%52%6+1% - Jhon Adolfo Arias Andradeprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 1.37
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 2.52
037%126%217%310%45%53%6+2% - Marshall Nyasha Munetsiprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.54
035%131%219%39%44%51%6+1% - Hee-Chan Hwangprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 1.18
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 2.38
041%128%215%38%44%52%6+1% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 2.08
041%128%216%38%44%52%6+1% - Mateus Manéprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 1.07
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 1.50
042%129%216%38%43%51%6+1% - André Trindade da Costa Netoprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.00
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.16
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Milan Smitprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 2.22
048%127%213%37%43%51%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.97
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.15
042%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Sam Gallagherprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 41
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 2.14
044%131%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Róbert Boženíkprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 2.13
048%128%213%36%43%51%6+1% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.49
048%129%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Angel Gomesprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 39
- Proj.
- 0.87
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 2.00
049%128%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.85
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.07
046%132%214%35%42%50%6+0% - Jean-Ricner Bellegardeprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 0.82
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.53
050%129%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.72
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.06
054%128%212%34%41%50%6+0% - Rodrigo Martins Gomesprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 38
- Proj.
- 0.69
- O 1.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 1.63
057%127%210%34%41%51%6+0%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots on target43 playersHighest: Adam Armstrong, 0.77 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
- Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 0.5
- 52%
- Model /90
- 0.84
048%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.68
- O 0.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 0.70
052%132%211%33%41%5+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.56
- O 0.5
- 41%
- Model /90
- 0.74
059%129%29%32%40%5+0% - Toluwalase Emmanuel Arokodareprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.54
- O 0.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.15
064%124%28%33%41%5+0% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.46
- O 0.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 0.83
066%124%27%32%4+0% - Hee-Chan Hwangprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 45
- Proj.
- 0.44
- O 0.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 0.88
068%123%27%32%4+0% - Jhon Adolfo Arias Andradeprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.43
- O 0.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 0.79
068%123%27%32%4+0% - Marshall Nyasha Munetsiprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.41
- O 0.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 0.51
068%125%26%31%4+0% - Mateus Manéprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 0.38
- O 0.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 0.53
070%123%26%31%4+0% - Milan Smitprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.35
- O 0.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 0.80
073%121%25%31%4+0% - Sam Gallagherprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 41
- Proj.
- 0.35
- O 0.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 0.77
072%122%25%31%4+0% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.34
- O 0.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 0.41
072%123%25%31%4+0% - Róbert Boženíkprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.33
- O 0.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 0.74
074%120%25%31%4+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.29
- O 0.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 0.48
076%119%24%3+1% - Angel Gomesprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 39
- Proj.
- 0.27
- O 0.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 0.62
078%118%23%3+1% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.27
- O 0.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.34
077%119%23%3+0% - Jean-Ricner Bellegardeprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 0.25
- O 0.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.46
079%118%23%3+0% - Emre Tezgelprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 25
- Proj.
- 0.23
- O 0.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 0.84
080%117%23%3+1% - Ladislav Krejčíprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.23
- O 0.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 0.25
080%118%22%3+0% - André Trindade da Costa Netoprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.22
- O 0.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.26
081%117%22%3+0%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.
Fouls won43 playersHighest: Yerson Mosquera, 1.30 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
- Yerson Mosqueraprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 1.30
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.45
032%132%220%310%44%52%6+1% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.20
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.24
033%134%220%39%43%51%6+0% - Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.17
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.29
034%134%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 1.02
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.29
041%132%217%37%42%51%6+0% - André Trindade da Costa Netoprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.02
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.19
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 1.01
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.67
044%129%215%37%43%51%6+1% - Mateus Manéprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.38
045%129%215%37%43%51%6+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.95
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.26
043%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Toluwalase Emmanuel Arokodareprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.93
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.97
050%126%212%36%43%51%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.93
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.10
044%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Marshall Nyasha Munetsiprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.13
045%132%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.64
048%128%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Steven N'Kemboanza Mike Christopher Nzonziprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 46
- Proj.
- 0.88
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.71
052%124%213%36%43%51%6+0% - Jean-Ricner Bellegardeprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 48
- Proj.
- 0.87
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.63
048%129%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Eric Junior Bocatprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.12
050%130%213%35%42%50%6+0% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.31
050%129%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.79
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.16
052%129%213%35%42%50%6+0% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.02
050%131%213%34%41%50%6+0% - Jhon Adolfo Arias Andradeprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 49
- Proj.
- 0.75
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.38
054%127%212%35%42%50%6+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 1.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.84
051%132%212%34%41%5+0%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.
Cards43 playersHighest: José Pedro Malheiro de Sá, 0.18 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card" (D-048). The trends column alongside counts yellows only.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
- José Pedro Malheiro de Sáprovisional
GK · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.18
084%115%21%3+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.18
086%113%2+1% - André Trindade da Costa Netoprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.18
086%113%2+1% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.24
086%112%2+1% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.15
087%112%2+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.17
087%112%2+1% - Yerson Mosqueraprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.16
087%112%2+1% - Maksym Talovierovprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.17
087%112%2+1% - Ben Wilmotprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.13
088%111%2+1% - Tote António Gomesprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.13
089%110%2+1% - Emmanuel Agbadouprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.13
089%110%2+1% - Marshall Nyasha Munetsiprovisional
MID · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.15
089%110%2+1% - Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.13
089%110%2+1% - Ladislav Krejčíprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.12
089%110%2+1% - Aaron Cresswellprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.13
089%110%2+1% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.15
089%110%2+1% - Ben Gibsonprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.14
090%110%2+1% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.16
090%19%2+1% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.10
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.13
090%19%2+1% - Santiago Ignacio Bueno Sciuttoprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.10
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.13
090%19%2+1%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.
Saves43 playersHighest: Viktor Johansson, 3.13 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
- Viktor Johanssonprovisional
GK · Stoke City
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 3.13
- O 2.5
- 58%
- Model /90
- 3.13
06%115%221%320%416%510%6+12% - Tommy Simkimprovisional
GK · Stoke City
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.82
- O 2.5
- 52%
- Model /90
- 2.82
08%118%222%320%414%59%6+9% - Sam Johnstoneprovisional
GK · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.47
- O 2.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 2.47
010%122%224%319%412%57%6+6% - José Pedro Malheiro de Sáprovisional
GK · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.33
- O 2.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 2.33
012%123%225%319%411%56%6+4% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ben Wilmotprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Aaron Cresswellprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Maksym Talovierovprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ben Gibsonprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Eric Junior Bocatprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ladislav Krejčíprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Emmanuel Agbadouprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 84
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Tote António Gomesprovisional
DEF · Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0%
20 of 43 players shown, ranked by projection.