Championship · England
SouthamptonvStoke City
Referee
Steve Martin
0 matches on record — under 15, so the model falls back toward the league mean
Fouls per game
—
League average
23.2
fouls per match, both teams
Angles
every priced linebuilderformEric-Junior Bocat over 0.5 shots: 8/10 of his last 10
Last 20: 10/20 · 3/4 away · strip 2 3 0 1 0 1 1 3 3 1 · market 58% · best 1.95 (Coral) · bet365 1.91
Facts with sample sizes, not predictions. The market % beside a line is the books’ median price with margin in, and the over market runs hot.
Value — 6 live calls
- Taylor Harwood-Bellisover 1.50 Shots3.50 at bet365 · fair 3.10+12.9%
- Eric-Junior Bocatover 0.50 Shots1.91 at bet365 · fair 1.73+10.3%
- Finn Azazover 2.50 Shots1.80 at bet365 · fair 1.65+9.1%
- Léo Scienzaover 3.50 Shots2.20 at bet365 · fair 2.05+7.3%
- Jun-ho Baeover 2.50 Shots4.00 at bet365 · fair 3.75+6.7%
- Ryan Manningover 0.50 Shots1.18 at bet365 · fair 1.11+6.5%
Published at the price shown and scored against the closing line whatever happens next — the same rows, with staking context, are on the value board and in the track record.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260816-1555 · Shots v20260816-1555 · Shots on target v20260816-1555 · Fouls won v20260816-1555 · Saves v20260816-1229
Model projections
Fouls59 playersHighest: Róbert Boženík, 1.61 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Róbert BoženíkFWD | Stoke City | 2.86 | 43provisional | 1.61 | 44% | 23 | 026% 130% 221% 312% 46% 53% 6+2% |
| Svante IngelssonMID | Stoke City | 1.70 | 72provisional | 1.44 | 42% | 76 | 026% 133% 223% 312% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Sam GallagherFWD | Stoke City | 1.92 | 44provisional | 1.14 | 31% | 42 | 035% 134% 219% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Ben PearsonMID | Stoke City | 1.47 | 64provisional | 1.13 | 31% | 44 | 035% 134% 220% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Caspar JanderMID | Southampton | 1.19 | 80provisional | 1.08 | 30% | 38 | 035% 136% 219% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Lewis BakerMID | Stoke City | 1.26 | 74provisional | 1.08 | 29% | 49 | 036% 135% 219% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Million ManhoefFWD | Stoke City | 1.24 | 73provisional | 1.05 | 29% | 80 | 036% 135% 219% 37% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Flynn DownesMID | Southampton | 1.33 | 66provisional | 1.04 | 28% | 66 | 038% 134% 218% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Lamine CisséFWD | Stoke City | 1.38 | 60provisional | 1.01 | 27% | 34 | 039% 134% 218% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Ethan GalbraithMID | Stoke City | 1.02 | 81provisional | 0.94 | 24% | 40 | 040% 136% 217% 36% 41% 5+0% |
10 of 59 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 59 →
Shots59 playersHighest: Finn Azaz, 2.28 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finn AzazMID | Southampton | 2.98 | 66provisional | 2.28 | 61% | 91 | 016% 123% 222% 317% 411% 56% 6+6% |
| Léo ScienzaMID | Southampton | 2.89 | 65provisional | 2.22 | 62% | 67 | 014% 124% 224% 318% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Lewis DobbinFWD | Southampton | 2.65 | 62provisional | 1.95 | 55% | 67 | 019% 126% 223% 316% 49% 54% 6+3% |
| Cyle LarinFWD | Southampton | 2.75 | 52provisional | 1.74 | 48% | 51 | 024% 128% 221% 313% 47% 54% 6+2% |
| Cameron ArcherFWD | Southampton | 2.59 | 51provisional | 1.61 | 45% | 65 | 026% 129% 221% 313% 47% 53% 6+2% |
| Million ManhoefFWD | Stoke City | 1.91 | 73provisional | 1.59 | 46% | 80 | 023% 131% 223% 313% 46% 52% 6+1% |
| Ross StewartFWD | Southampton | 2.82 | 41provisional | 1.47 | 40% | 39 | 029% 131% 220% 311% 45% 52% 6+2% |
| Ben Brereton DíazFWD | Southampton | 2.01 | 59provisional | 1.41 | 40% | 69 | 030% 131% 221% 311% 45% 52% 6+1% |
| Kuryu MatsukiMID | Southampton | 1.72 | 62provisional | 1.26 | 35% | 23 | 033% 132% 220% 310% 44% 51% 6+1% |
| Divin MubamaFWD | Southampton | 2.22 | 43provisional | 1.20 | 32% | 28 | 038% 130% 217% 39% 44% 52% 6+1% |
| Ethan GalbraithMID | Stoke City | 1.30 | 81provisional | 1.19 | 33% | 40 | 032% 135% 221% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Sorba ThomasFWD | Stoke City | 1.23 | 86provisional | 1.19 | 33% | 46 | 032% 135% 221% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Tom FellowsMID | Southampton | 1.50 | 67provisional | 1.18 | 33% | 86 | 033% 134% 220% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Ryan ManningDEF | Southampton | 1.35 | 76provisional | 1.17 | 32% | 70 | 034% 134% 220% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Lamine CisséFWD | Stoke City | 1.62 | 60provisional | 1.16 | 32% | 34 | 036% 132% 219% 39% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Róbert BoženíkFWD | Stoke City | 2.13 | 43provisional | 1.13 | 30% | 23 | 039% 131% 217% 38% 43% 51% 6+1% |
| Taylor Harwood-BellisDEF | Southampton | 1.02 | 87provisional | 0.99 | 26% | 78 | 038% 136% 218% 36% 42% 5+1% |
| Jamie Paul DonleyMID | Stoke City | 1.32 | 63provisional | 0.98 | 26% | 17 | 041% 133% 217% 37% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Lewis BakerMID | Stoke City | 1.14 | 74provisional | 0.96 | 25% | 49 | 041% 134% 217% 36% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Jun-ho BaeMID | Stoke City | 1.20 | 64provisional | 0.89 | 23% | 88 | 044% 133% 215% 35% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Tomas RigoMID | Stoke City | 1.13 | 63provisional | 0.84 | 21% | 32 | 046% 133% 215% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Yukinari SugawaraDEF | Southampton | 1.03 | 70provisional | 0.84 | 21% | 63 | 045% 134% 215% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Samuel EdozieFWD | Southampton | 2.43 | 23provisional | 0.81 | 19% | 17 | 047% 133% 213% 34% 41% 50% 6+0% |
| Caspar JanderMID | Southampton | 0.89 | 80provisional | 0.80 | 19% | 38 | 046% 134% 214% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Sam GallagherFWD | Stoke City | 1.44 | 44provisional | 0.80 | 20% | 42 | 048% 132% 213% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Damion DownsFWD | Southampton | 1.85 | 30provisional | 0.74 | 17% | 23 | 051% 131% 212% 34% 41% 50% 6+0% |
| Eric-Junior BocatDEF | Stoke City | 0.89 | 72provisional | 0.74 | 18% | 60 | 050% 133% 213% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| James BreeDEF | Southampton | 0.81 | 79provisional | 0.73 | 17% | 59 | 049% 134% 213% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Milan SmitFWD | Stoke City | 1.66 | 33provisional | 0.71 | 17% | 13 | 054% 129% 211% 34% 41% 50% 6+0% |
| Djibril SoumaréMID | Stoke City | 1.25 | 44provisional | 0.69 | 16% | 26 | 054% 130% 211% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Ryan FraserFWD | Southampton | 1.12 | 49provisional | 0.67 | 16% | 24 | 054% 130% 211% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Bosun LawalDEF | Stoke City | 0.76 | 73provisional | 0.63 | 14% | 35 | 054% 132% 211% 33% 4+1% |
| Svante IngelssonMID | Stoke City | 0.74 | 72provisional | 0.62 | 13% | 76 | 055% 132% 210% 32% 4+1% |
| Emre TezgelFWD | Stoke City | 1.75 | 24provisional | 0.59 | 12% | 12 | 058% 130% 29% 32% 41% 5+0% |
| Tatsuki SekoMID | Stoke City | 0.81 | 57provisional | 0.54 | 12% | 68 | 060% 128% 29% 32% 4+1% |
| Flynn DownesMID | Southampton | 0.68 | 66provisional | 0.52 | 10% | 66 | 061% 128% 28% 32% 4+0% |
| Nathan WoodDEF | Southampton | 0.57 | 77provisional | 0.50 | 10% | 48 | 062% 129% 28% 32% 4+0% |
| Joe AriboMID | Southampton | 1.01 | 39provisional | 0.50 | 10% | 45 | 063% 127% 28% 32% 40% 5+0% |
| Ben WilmotDEF | Stoke City | 0.50 | 85provisional | 0.48 | 9% | 74 | 062% 129% 27% 31% 4+0% |
| Joshua QuarshieDEF | Southampton | 0.65 | 63provisional | 0.47 | 9% | 13 | 064% 127% 27% 32% 4+0% |
| Steven N'ZonziMID | Stoke City | 0.83 | 46provisional | 0.47 | 9% | 30 | 066% 125% 27% 32% 4+0% |
| Jack StephensDEF | Southampton | 0.58 | 68provisional | 0.45 | 8% | 52 | 065% 126% 27% 31% 4+0% |
| Cameron BraggMID | Southampton | 0.75 | 45provisional | 0.41 | 8% | 18 | 068% 124% 26% 31% 4+0% |
| Ben GibsonDEF | Stoke City | 0.51 | 64provisional | 0.38 | 6% | 37 | 069% 124% 25% 31% 4+0% |
| Maksym TaloverovDEF | Stoke City | 0.48 | 67provisional | 0.37 | 6% | 28 | 070% 124% 25% 31% 4+0% |
| Junior TchamadeuDEF | Stoke City | 0.42 | 68provisional | 0.33 | 5% | 67 | 073% 122% 24% 3+1% |
| Aaron CresswellDEF | Stoke City | 0.47 | 60provisional | 0.33 | 5% | 43 | 073% 122% 24% 3+1% |
| Ben PearsonMID | Stoke City | 0.42 | 64provisional | 0.32 | 5% | 44 | 073% 122% 24% 3+1% |
| WelingtonDEF | Southampton | 0.44 | 50provisional | 0.26 | 4% | 29 | 078% 119% 23% 3+0% |
| Oriol RomeuMID | Southampton | 0.57 | 35provisional | 0.26 | 4% | 31 | 078% 118% 23% 3+1% |
| Mads RoerslevDEF | Southampton | 0.43 | 39provisional | 0.21 | 3% | 35 | 082% 116% 22% 3+0% |
| Alex McCarthyGK | Southampton | 0.00 | 86provisional | 0.00 | — | 12 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Tommy SimkinGK | Stoke City | 0.00 | 87provisional | 0.00 | — | 15 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Daniel PeretzGK | Southampton | 0.00 | 89provisional | 0.00 | — | 26 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Gavin BazunuGK | Stoke City | 0.00 | 88provisional | 0.00 | — | 25 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Aaron RamsdaleGK | Southampton | 0.00 | 88provisional | 0.00 | — | 42 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Viktor JohanssonGK | Stoke City | 0.00 | 89provisional | 0.00 | — | 72 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Gavin BazunuGK | Stoke City | 0.00 | 88provisional | 0.00 | — | 25 | 0100% 1+0% |
| Josh GriffithsGK | — | 0.00 | 87provisional | 0.00 | — | 30 | 0100% 1+0% |
All 59 players shown, ranked by projection. Show fewer ↥
Shots on target59 playersHighest: Léo Scienza, 0.88 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 0.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Léo ScienzaMID | Southampton | 1.14 | 65provisional | 0.88 | 56% | 67 | 044% 134% 215% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Cyle LarinFWD | Southampton | 1.29 | 52provisional | 0.82 | 52% | 51 | 048% 132% 214% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Finn AzazMID | Southampton | 0.96 | 66provisional | 0.73 | 49% | 91 | 051% 132% 213% 34% 41% 5+0% |
| Ross StewartFWD | Southampton | 1.24 | 41provisional | 0.65 | 45% | 39 | 055% 130% 211% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Cameron ArcherFWD | Southampton | 1.01 | 51provisional | 0.63 | 44% | 65 | 056% 130% 210% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Lewis DobbinFWD | Southampton | 0.84 | 62provisional | 0.62 | 45% | 67 | 055% 131% 210% 33% 41% 5+0% |
| Million ManhoefFWD | Stoke City | 0.71 | 73provisional | 0.59 | 44% | 80 | 056% 131% 210% 32% 4+0% |
| Divin MubamaFWD | Southampton | 0.87 | 43provisional | 0.47 | 35% | 28 | 065% 126% 27% 32% 4+0% |
| Sorba ThomasFWD | Stoke City | 0.48 | 86provisional | 0.46 | 37% | 46 | 063% 129% 27% 31% 4+0% |
| Ben Brereton DíazFWD | Southampton | 0.66 | 59provisional | 0.46 | 36% | 69 | 064% 127% 27% 31% 4+0% |
10 of 59 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 59 →
Fouls won59 playersHighest: Léo Scienza, 2.26 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 1.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Léo ScienzaMID | Southampton | 2.98 | 65provisional | 2.26 | 63% | 67 | 014% 123% 224% 318% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Lamine CisséFWD | Stoke City | 1.74 | 60provisional | 1.22 | 34% | 34 | 034% 132% 220% 39% 44% 51% 6+0% |
| Kuryu MatsukiMID | Southampton | 1.56 | 62provisional | 1.13 | 31% | 23 | 036% 133% 219% 38% 43% 51% 6+0% |
| Ryan ManningDEF | Southampton | 1.17 | 76provisional | 1.01 | 27% | 70 | 039% 134% 218% 37% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Ethan GalbraithMID | Stoke City | 1.10 | 81provisional | 1.00 | 27% | 40 | 038% 135% 218% 36% 42% 50% 6+0% |
| Caspar JanderMID | Southampton | 1.05 | 80provisional | 0.95 | 25% | 38 | 040% 135% 217% 36% 42% 5+0% |
| Divin MubamaFWD | Southampton | 1.80 | 43provisional | 0.95 | 25% | 28 | 045% 130% 214% 36% 42% 51% 6+0% |
| Sorba ThomasFWD | Stoke City | 0.96 | 86provisional | 0.93 | 24% | 46 | 040% 136% 217% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Taylor Harwood-BellisDEF | Southampton | 0.94 | 87provisional | 0.91 | 23% | 78 | 041% 136% 216% 35% 41% 5+0% |
| Jun-ho BaeMID | Stoke City | 1.20 | 64provisional | 0.89 | 23% | 88 | 044% 133% 215% 35% 42% 50% 6+0% |
10 of 59 players shown, ranked by projection. Show all 59 →
Saves8 playersHighest: Viktor Johansson, 3.19 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
| Player | Team | Model /90 | Exp. mins | Projected | Over 2.5 | n | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktor JohanssonGK | Stoke City | 3.21 | 89provisional | 3.19 | 59% | 72 | 06% 115% 220% 320% 416% 511% 6+13% |
| Tommy SimkinGK | Stoke City | 2.87 | 87provisional | 2.79 | 51% | 15 | 08% 118% 223% 320% 414% 59% 6+8% |
| Gavin BazunuGK | Stoke City | 2.75 | 88provisional | 2.71 | 49% | 25 | 09% 119% 223% 320% 414% 58% 6+7% |
| Josh GriffithsGK | — | 2.78 | 87provisional | 2.71 | 49% | 30 | 09% 119% 223% 320% 414% 58% 6+8% |
| Aaron RamsdaleGK | Southampton | 2.45 | 88provisional | 2.39 | 42% | 42 | 011% 122% 224% 319% 412% 56% 6+5% |
| Daniel PeretzGK | Southampton | 2.34 | 89provisional | 2.32 | 40% | 26 | 012% 123% 225% 319% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Alex McCarthyGK | Southampton | 2.38 | 86provisional | 2.31 | 40% | 12 | 012% 123% 225% 319% 411% 56% 6+4% |
| Gavin BazunuGK | Stoke City | 2.13 | 88provisional | 2.09 | 35% | 25 | 014% 126% 225% 317% 410% 55% 6+3% |
2 of 7 markets have no projection for this fixture.