Championship · England
SouthamptonvStoke City
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260811-1858 · Tackles v20260811-1858 · Shots v20260811-1858 · Shots on target v20260811-1905 · Fouls won v20260811-1858 · Cards v20260811-1905 · Saves v20260812-1340
Model projections
Fouls50 playersHighest: Sorba Thomas, 1.20 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
- Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.20
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.23
032%135%221%39%43%51%6+0% - Flynn Downesprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.05
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.25
038%134%218%37%42%51%6+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.03
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.37
039%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Róbert Boženíkprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 1.03
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 2.33
045%128%214%37%43%51%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.00
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.19
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Caspar Janderprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.09
042%133%216%36%42%50%6+0% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.92
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.66
047%129%214%36%42%51%6+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.35
046%130%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.21
044%133%216%36%42%50%6+0% - Sam Gallagherprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 41
- Proj.
- 0.88
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.95
046%132%214%35%42%51%6+0% - Finn Azazprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 0.87
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.05
044%133%215%35%41%5+0% - Cyle Larinprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 53
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.47
047%131%214%35%42%51%6+0% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.82
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.33
049%130%214%35%42%50%6+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.03
047%133%214%35%41%5+0% - Welington Damascena Santosprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.36
052%128%213%35%42%50%6+0% - Leonardo Weschenfelder-Scienzaprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.75
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.02
050%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Milan Smitprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.75
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.69
054%127%212%35%42%51%6+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.75
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.87
049%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.23
052%129%212%34%41%5+0% - Ryan Fraserprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.35
052%129%212%34%41%50%6+0%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.
Tackles50 playersHighest: Caspar Jander, 1.89 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
- Caspar Janderprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 1.89
- O 1.5
- 55%
- Model /90
- 2.20
019%126%225%317%49%54%6+2% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 1.83
- O 1.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 2.71
025%125%220%314%49%54%6+3% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 1.62
- O 1.5
- 47%
- Model /90
- 2.04
024%130%223%314%46%52%6+1% - Flynn Downesprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.57
- O 1.5
- 46%
- Model /90
- 1.87
024%130%224%313%46%52%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.52
- O 1.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 1.80
026%130%223%313%46%52%6+1% - Finn Azazprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 1.49
- O 1.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 1.81
025%131%223%313%45%52%6+1% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 1.49
- O 1.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 2.41
030%127%220%312%46%52%6+1% - Maksym Talovierovprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 1.38
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 1.70
028%132%222%311%44%51%6+1% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.33
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.54
029%133%222%311%44%51%6+0% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.32
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.74
031%131%221%311%44%51%6+0% - Ben Wilmotprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 1.30
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.37
028%135%222%310%43%51%6+0% - Joe Ariboprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 55
- Proj.
- 1.29
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 2.12
034%131%219%310%44%52%6+1% - Aaron Cresswellprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.28
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 1.44
029%135%222%310%43%51%6+0% - Tom Fellowsprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 1.28
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.93
031%133%221%310%44%51%6+0% - Leonardo Weschenfelder-Scienzaprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.27
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.72
031%133%221%310%44%51%6+0% - Cameron Braggprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 1.25
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 2.78
041%126%215%39%45%52%6+1% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 2.06
036%129%219%310%44%51%6+1% - Jack Stephensprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 1.20
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.34
032%133%221%39%43%51%6+0% - James Breeprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 1.20
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.46
033%133%221%39%43%51%6+0% - Ben Gibsonprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 1.18
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.48
034%133%220%39%43%51%6+0%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots50 playersHighest: Adam Armstrong, 1.96 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
- Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 1.96
- O 1.5
- 53%
- Model /90
- 2.62
021%126%221%314%49%55%6+4% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.81
- O 1.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 1.87
020%129%224%315%47%53%6+2% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 1.59
- O 1.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 2.11
027%129%221%312%46%53%6+2% - Cyle Larinprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 53
- Proj.
- 1.56
- O 1.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 2.67
030%128%219%311%46%53%6+3% - Finn Azazprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 1.35
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.63
031%131%220%310%44%52%6+1% - Ryan Fraserprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 1.33
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 2.41
036%128%217%39%45%52%6+2% - Leonardo Weschenfelder-Scienzaprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.68
034%132%219%39%44%51%6+1% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 1.23
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 2.24
039%128%216%39%44%52%6+1% - Cameron Archerprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 38
- Proj.
- 1.19
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 2.86
041%129%215%38%44%52%6+2% - Caspar Janderprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 1.16
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.34
036%132%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Ross Stewartprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 38
- Proj.
- 1.15
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 2.72
040%130%216%38%44%52%6+1% - Milan Smitprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 1.06
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 2.38
046%127%214%37%44%52%6+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.04
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.24
040%132%217%37%43%51%6+0% - Sam Gallagherprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 41
- Proj.
- 1.03
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 2.30
042%132%215%37%43%51%6+1% - Róbert Boženíkprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 1.01
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 2.29
046%128%214%37%43%51%6+1% - Flynn Downesprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.17
041%133%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.60
045%129%215%37%43%51%6+0% - Tom Fellowsprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.44
043%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.15
044%132%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Kuryu Matsukiprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 0.87
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.54
049%129%213%36%42%51%6+0%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots on target50 playersHighest: Adam Armstrong, 0.78 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
- Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 0.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 1.04
050%131%213%34%41%5+0% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 0.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 0.75
050%133%213%34%41%5+0% - Cyle Larinprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 53
- Proj.
- 0.69
- O 0.5
- 46%
- Model /90
- 1.18
054%129%211%34%41%5+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.60
- O 0.5
- 43%
- Model /90
- 0.80
057%130%210%33%41%5+0% - Ryan Fraserprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.55
- O 0.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 1.00
061%127%29%33%41%5+0% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.49
- O 0.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 0.89
065%125%28%32%40%5+0% - Ross Stewartprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 38
- Proj.
- 0.49
- O 0.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.16
064%126%27%32%40%5+0% - Leonardo Weschenfelder-Scienzaprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 0.49
- O 0.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 0.66
063%127%27%32%4+0% - Cameron Archerprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 38
- Proj.
- 0.45
- O 0.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.09
067%124%27%32%40%5+0% - Finn Azazprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 0.42
- O 0.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 0.51
067%126%26%31%4+0% - Milan Smitprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.38
- O 0.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 0.86
071%121%26%31%4+0% - Sam Gallagherprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 41
- Proj.
- 0.37
- O 0.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 0.83
071%123%25%31%4+0% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.37
- O 0.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 0.44
070%124%25%31%4+0% - Róbert Boženíkprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 40
- Proj.
- 0.35
- O 0.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 0.80
073%121%25%31%4+0% - Caspar Janderprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 0.33
- O 0.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 0.39
072%122%24%3+1% - Flynn Downesprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.31
- O 0.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 0.37
074%122%24%3+1% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.31
- O 0.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 0.51
075%120%24%31%4+0% - Samuel Edozieprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 25
- Proj.
- 0.29
- O 0.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.06
076%119%24%31%4+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.29
- O 0.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 0.36
076%120%23%3+1% - Joe Ariboprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 55
- Proj.
- 0.28
- O 0.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.46
077%119%23%3+1%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.
Fouls won50 playersHighest: Leonardo Weschenfelder-Scienza, 1.43 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
- Leonardo Weschenfelder-Scienzaprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 66
- Proj.
- 1.43
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 1.94
030%130%220%311%45%52%6+1% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 1.13
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 1.17
035%134%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Caspar Janderprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 0.99
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.15
041%132%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Flynn Downesprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.99
- O 1.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 1.18
041%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.22
043%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.95
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.58
046%129%215%37%43%51%6+0% - Finn Azazprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.14
043%133%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Adam Armstrongprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.20
045%132%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.19
045%132%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.88
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 1.04
046%132%215%35%42%50%6+0% - Lamine Cisseprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.56
050%128%213%36%42%51%6+0% - Cyle Larinprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 53
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.43
049%130%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Ryan Fraserprovisional
FWD · Southampton
- Mins
- 50
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.51
050%129%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Steven N'Kemboanza Mike Christopher Nzonziprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 46
- Proj.
- 0.83
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 1.62
054%125%212%36%42%51%6+0% - Kuryu Matsukiprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 0.79
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.41
052%129%212%35%42%51%6+0% - Welington Damascena Santosprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.37
052%128%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Tom Fellowsprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.16
050%131%213%34%41%5+0% - Eric Junior Bocatprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.06
051%129%213%35%41%50%6+0% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.24
052%129%213%35%41%50%6+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.10
053%128%212%34%41%50%6+0%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.
Cards50 playersHighest: Flynn Downes, 0.18 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card" (D-048). The trends column alongside counts yellows only.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
- Flynn Downesprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.22
083%115%22%3+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.18
086%113%2+1% - Ben Pearsonprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 56
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.25
086%112%2+1% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.15
086%113%2+1% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.17
087%112%2+1% - Maksym Talovierovprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.17
087%112%2+1% - Taylor Harwood-Bellisprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.14
087%112%2+1% - Welington Damascena Santosprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.22
088%111%2+1% - Joshua Quarshieprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.16
088%111%2+1% - Ben Wilmotprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.13
088%111%2+1% - Finn Azazprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 74
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.15
088%111%2+1% - Caspar Janderprovisional
MID · Southampton
- Mins
- 78
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.15
088%111%2+1% - Aaron Cresswellprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.13
089%110%2+1% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.15
089%110%2+1% - Jack Stephensprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.13
089%110%2+1% - Ben Gibsonprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.14
089%110%2+1% - Gavin Bazunuprovisional
GK · Stoke City
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.11
089%110%2+1% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.16
090%19%2+1% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.13
090%19%2+1% - Aaron Ramsdaleprovisional
GK · Southampton
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 10%
- Model /90
- 0.11
090%19%2+1%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.
Saves50 playersHighest: Viktor Johansson, 3.17 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
- Viktor Johanssonprovisional
GK · Stoke City
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 3.17
- O 2.5
- 59%
- Model /90
- 3.17
06%115%220%320%416%510%6+12% - Tommy Simkimprovisional
GK · Stoke City
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.86
- O 2.5
- 52%
- Model /90
- 2.86
08%118%222%320%414%59%6+9% - Aaron Ramsdaleprovisional
GK · Southampton
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.80
- O 2.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 2.80
08%118%223%320%414%59%6+8% - Alex McCarthyprovisional
GK · Southampton
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.42
- O 2.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 2.42
011%122%224%319%412%56%6+5% - Daniel Peretzprovisional
GK · Southampton
- Mins
- 91
- Proj.
- 2.41
- O 2.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 2.38
011%122%224%319%412%56%6+5% - Gavin Bazunuprovisional
GK · Stoke City
- Mins
- 90
- Proj.
- 2.26
- O 2.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 2.26
012%124%225%318%411%56%6+4% - Sorba Thomasprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ben Wilmotprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Aaron Cresswellprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 80
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Lewis Bakerprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - J. Tchamadeuprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Maksym Talovierovprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 73
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ben Gibsonprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 72
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Joon-Ho Baeprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 71
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Mohammed Bosun Lawalprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Million Manhoefprovisional
FWD · Stoke City
- Mins
- 68
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Eric Junior Bocatprovisional
DEF · Stoke City
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Tatsuki Sekoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Taylor Harwood-Bellisprovisional
DEF · Southampton
- Mins
- 87
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Tomáš Rigoprovisional
MID · Stoke City
- Mins
- 54
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0%
20 of 50 players shown, ranked by projection.