Championship · England
Lincoln CityvPortsmouth
Referee
Not appointed
0 matches on record
Fouls per game
—
League average
22.6
fouls per match, both teams
Value
No edges published on this fixture. An edge is published only when a bookmaker's price beats the model's fair price by that market's full bar — most fixtures never produce one. The value board explains every gate a candidate has to clear.
What these numbers are
Not tips and not prices. Each row is the model's expected count for one player in this match — how many fouls, tackles or shots it thinks he records — plus the full spread of outcomes around it. Nothing here has been compared to a bookmaker.
Step 1
His own record
Every completed match in the dataset, as a rate per 90 minutes. The n column is how many matches that rests on.
Step 2
Pulled toward his position
A thin record gets pulled hard toward other players in his position, in his league — a goalkeeper toward goalkeepers, not toward the outfielders around him. How hard is fitted per market, not chosen: tackles pull about four times harder than shots on target.
Step 3
This fixture's conditions
How much of the stat the opponent concedes, what the referee's matches look like, and home or away. This is where a projection stops being a season average.
Step 4
Scaled to expected minutes
A rate becomes a count only once you say how long he plays. 60 minutes carries two-thirds the exposure of 90, and the distribution is built at that exposure.
How to read each columnClose
- Model /90
- The model's rate for this match with the minutes taken back out — steps 1 to 3 already applied. It moves with the opponent and the referee, so it is not his raw career rate; the builder shows career and model rates side by side.
- Exp. mins
- Minutes the model expects. Confirmed means the lineup is out; provisional means it is guessing from his start rate, and is the widest of the three.
- Projected
- The expected count in this match, at those minutes. This is the number a line is set against.
- Over 1.5, etc.
- Read straight off the distribution beside it, not off how often he has beaten that line before. It answers what the model thinks, not what has happened.
- n
- Matches behind his own rate. Under 30 it turns amber: the projection is mostly his position group speaking, and §6.3 will not publish an edge on it.
- Distribution
- The whole spread, not just the average. The dashed amber cut is the line; jade bars beat it. An expected 1.8 fouls made of 2 every week and an expected 1.8 made of a 0 and a 5 are different bets, and this is where you see which one you have.
Counts are modelled as negative binomial rather than Poisson, because fouls and tackles are overdispersed and a Poisson would systematically underprice the tails — which is exactly where over bets live. Every market on this page cleared its calibration gate before it was allowed to produce a projection: when the model says 60%, it lands within a point or so of 60% out of sample.
Fouls v20260811-1858 · Tackles v20260811-1858 · Shots v20260811-1858 · Shots on target v20260811-1905 · Fouls won v20260811-1858 · Cards v20260811-1905 · Saves v20260812-1340
Model projections
Fouls28 playersHighest: Callum Lang, 1.70 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Who referees the match. A strict official lifts every player on the pitch, which is the part most books price off a season average. See what has actually happened.
- Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.70
- O 1.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 2.02
023%128%223%314%47%53%6+2% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.57
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 1.74
024%131%223%313%46%52%6+1% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 1.42
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 2.01
030%130%221%311%45%52%6+1% - Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.38
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.91
035%127%219%311%45%52%6+1% - Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.54
029%133%221%310%44%51%6+1% - Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.33
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.54
030%132%221%310%44%51%6+1% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.25
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 1.43
032%133%221%310%44%51%6+0% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 1.23
- O 1.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 1.78
034%132%219%39%44%51%6+1% - Florian Bianchiniprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 1.21
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 2.13
037%130%218%39%44%52%6+1% - Adrian Segečićprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 1.21
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.81
036%131%218%39%44%51%6+1% - Terry Devlinprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 1.11
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 1.75
041%129%216%38%44%51%6+1% - Thomas Waddinghamprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 17
- Proj.
- 1.05
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 5.57
042%133%215%36%42%51%6+1% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.98
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.57
043%130%216%37%42%51%6+0% - Regan Pooleprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.02
040%135%217%36%42%50%6+0% - Connor Ogilvieprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 86
- Proj.
- 0.95
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 0.99
040%135%217%36%42%5+0% - Luke Le Rouxprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.94
- O 1.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 1.79
045%130%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Zak Swansonprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.93
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.24
044%132%216%36%42%51%6+0% - Jacob Brownprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 0.89
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 2.48
054%123%211%36%43%51%6+1% - Mackenzie Kirkprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 0.88
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 2.45
052%126%211%36%43%51%6+1% - Harvey Blairprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 29
- Proj.
- 0.88
- O 1.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 2.77
046%132%214%35%42%51%6+0%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.
Tackles28 playersHighest: Ebou Adams, 2.46 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Possession share. A tackle count depends far more on how much of the match is played at your own end than on a player’s own form. See what has actually happened.
- Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 2.46
- O 1.5
- 68%
- Model /90
- 2.85
012%120%223%319%413%57%6+5% - Zak Swansonprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 2.18
- O 1.5
- 60%
- Model /90
- 2.92
018%122%222%317%411%56%6+4% - Luke Le Rouxprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 2.16
- O 1.5
- 55%
- Model /90
- 4.10
020%124%219%314%410%56%6+6% - Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 2.03
- O 1.5
- 55%
- Model /90
- 2.81
024%122%219%315%410%56%6+4% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.90
- O 1.5
- 55%
- Model /90
- 2.17
018%127%225%317%49%54%6+2% - Jordan Williamsprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 1.82
- O 1.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 2.69
022%127%222%315%48%54%6+2% - Regan Pooleprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 1.67
- O 1.5
- 49%
- Model /90
- 1.77
020%131%225%314%46%52%6+1% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 1.67
- O 1.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 2.65
027%125%221%314%47%53%6+2% - Terry Devlinprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 1.65
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 2.59
029%126%219%313%47%54%6+2% - Connor Ogilvieprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 86
- Proj.
- 1.53
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 1.59
022%133%225%313%45%52%6+1% - Josh Knightprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 69
- Proj.
- 1.51
- O 1.5
- 43%
- Model /90
- 1.95
029%128%221%313%46%52%6+1% - Márk Kosznovszkyprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 1.42
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 3.00
035%128%217%310%46%53%6+2% - Hayden Matthewsprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 58
- Proj.
- 1.39
- O 1.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 2.16
033%128%219%311%45%52%6+1% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 1.23
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 1.75
033%132%220%310%44%51%6+0% - Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.23
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 1.47
032%133%221%310%43%51%6+0% - Conor Shaughnessyprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 59
- Proj.
- 1.23
- O 1.5
- 35%
- Model /90
- 1.88
035%130%219%310%44%51%6+0% - Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.19
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.36
032%135%221%39%43%51%6+0% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 1.14
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.65
035%133%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.12
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 1.24
034%135%220%38%42%51%6+0% - Ibane Bowatprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 1.12
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 2.15
043%127%215%39%44%52%6+1%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots28 playersHighest: Josh Murphy, 2.42 expectedshowhide
What drives it — The player’s own shot rate, shrunk toward others in his position, then adjusted for how many shots the opponent concedes. See what has actually happened.
- Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 2.42
- O 1.5
- 64%
- Model /90
- 2.77
014%122%222%317%411%57%6+7% - Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 2.37
- O 1.5
- 62%
- Model /90
- 2.82
016%122%221%316%411%57%6+7% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 2.30
- O 1.5
- 62%
- Model /90
- 2.54
015%123%222%317%411%56%6+6% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 1.98
- O 1.5
- 53%
- Model /90
- 2.81
022%125%221%314%49%55%6+4% - Adrian Segečićprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 1.92
- O 1.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 2.87
024%126%220%313%48%55%6+5% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 1.91
- O 1.5
- 51%
- Model /90
- 2.77
023%126%221%314%48%54%6+4% - Florian Bianchiniprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 1.70
- O 1.5
- 45%
- Model /90
- 2.99
029%127%219%312%47%54%6+4% - Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.35
- O 1.5
- 38%
- Model /90
- 1.57
031%131%220%310%45%52%6+1% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 1.34
- O 1.5
- 37%
- Model /90
- 2.13
035%128%218%310%45%52%6+1% - Mackenzie Kirkprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 29%
- Model /90
- 3.45
044%127%212%37%44%53%6+3% - Jacob Brownprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 1.12
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 3.09
050%123%211%37%44%52%6+3% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.11
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 1.27
037%133%218%38%43%51%6+0% - Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.04
- O 1.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.43
044%128%216%38%43%51%6+1% - Harvey Blairprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 29
- Proj.
- 0.96
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 3.02
044%131%214%36%42%51%6+1% - Luke Le Rouxprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.84
- O 1.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 1.60
049%129%213%35%42%51%6+0% - Márk Kosznovszkyprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.80
- O 1.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.68
053%128%212%35%42%51%6+0% - Connor Ogilvieprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 86
- Proj.
- 0.78
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.81
048%134%213%34%41%5+0% - Ibane Bowatprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.70
- O 1.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 1.34
057%126%211%34%42%51%6+0% - Thomas Waddinghamprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 17
- Proj.
- 0.67
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 3.59
056%129%210%33%41%51%6+0% - Josh Knightprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 69
- Proj.
- 0.65
- O 1.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.84
056%129%211%33%41%5+0%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.
Shots on target28 playersHighest: Callum Lang, 0.86 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Shot volume first, conversion second — literally: the projection is the shots model thinned by the player’s own on-target rate, so a high-volume low-accuracy shooter and a sniper price differently at the same shot count. See what has actually happened.
- Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.86
- O 0.5
- 54%
- Model /90
- 1.02
046%132%215%35%42%50%6+0% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.81
- O 0.5
- 53%
- Model /90
- 0.89
047%133%214%34%41%5+0% - Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 0.75
- O 0.5
- 50%
- Model /90
- 0.86
050%132%213%34%41%5+0% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 0.67
- O 0.5
- 46%
- Model /90
- 0.95
054%130%211%33%41%5+0% - Adrian Segečićprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 0.64
- O 0.5
- 44%
- Model /90
- 0.96
056%129%210%33%41%5+0% - Florian Bianchiniprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 0.63
- O 0.5
- 43%
- Model /90
- 1.11
057%128%210%33%41%5+0% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 0.53
- O 0.5
- 39%
- Model /90
- 0.76
061%128%28%32%4+1% - Mackenzie Kirkprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 0.47
- O 0.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.32
068%122%27%32%41%5+0% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.45
- O 0.5
- 34%
- Model /90
- 0.72
066%125%27%32%4+0% - Jacob Brownprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 0.44
- O 0.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 1.23
070%120%27%32%41%5+0% - Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.38
- O 0.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 0.44
069%124%25%31%4+0% - Harvey Blairprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 29
- Proj.
- 0.35
- O 0.5
- 28%
- Model /90
- 1.11
072%122%25%31%4+0% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 0.31
- O 0.5
- 26%
- Model /90
- 0.36
074%122%24%3+1% - Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.30
- O 0.5
- 25%
- Model /90
- 0.42
075%120%24%31%4+0% - Luke Le Rouxprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.26
- O 0.5
- 22%
- Model /90
- 0.49
078%118%23%3+1% - Thomas Waddinghamprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 17
- Proj.
- 0.24
- O 0.5
- 20%
- Model /90
- 1.30
080%117%23%30%4+0% - Márk Kosznovszkyprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.22
- O 0.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.46
082%116%22%3+0% - Ibane Bowatprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.20
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.39
083%115%22%3+0% - Regan Pooleprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.20
- O 0.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.21
082%116%22%3+0% - Zak Swansonprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.26
083%115%22%3+0%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.
Fouls won28 playersHighest: Josh Murphy, 1.71 expectedshowhide
What drives it — How much a player runs at defenders. Dribble volume drives this far more than the referee does. See what has actually happened.
- Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.71
- O 1.5
- 48%
- Model /90
- 1.96
023%129%222%313%47%53%6+2% - Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 1.65
- O 1.5
- 46%
- Model /90
- 1.96
026%128%221%313%47%53%6+2% - Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 1.51
- O 1.5
- 42%
- Model /90
- 1.75
028%130%221%312%46%52%6+1% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 1.43
- O 1.5
- 40%
- Model /90
- 1.58
028%131%221%311%45%52%6+1% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 1.32
- O 1.5
- 36%
- Model /90
- 1.86
033%130%219%310%44%52%6+1% - Adrian Segečićprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 1.24
- O 1.5
- 33%
- Model /90
- 1.85
037%130%218%39%44%52%6+1% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 1.17
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.70
037%131%218%39%44%51%6+1% - Connor Ogilvieprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 86
- Proj.
- 1.17
- O 1.5
- 32%
- Model /90
- 1.23
034%134%219%38%43%51%6+0% - Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 1.13
- O 1.5
- 31%
- Model /90
- 1.56
041%128%216%38%44%51%6+1% - Florian Bianchiniprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 51
- Proj.
- 1.12
- O 1.5
- 30%
- Model /90
- 1.97
041%129%216%38%44%51%6+1% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 1.02
- O 1.5
- 27%
- Model /90
- 1.17
040%133%217%37%42%51%6+0% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.91
- O 1.5
- 24%
- Model /90
- 1.45
046%129%215%36%42%51%6+0% - Regan Pooleprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.90
- O 1.5
- 23%
- Model /90
- 0.96
043%134%215%35%42%50%6+0% - Luke Le Rouxprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.79
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.49
051%129%212%35%42%51%6+0% - Mackenzie Kirkprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 0.77
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 2.15
057%125%210%35%42%51%6+1% - Terry Devlinprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.76
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 1.19
053%128%212%35%42%50%6+0% - Josh Knightprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 69
- Proj.
- 0.76
- O 1.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.98
052%129%213%34%41%50%6+0% - Márk Kosznovszkyprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.74
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.55
055%127%211%34%42%51%6+0% - Zak Swansonprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.73
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 0.98
052%130%212%34%41%5+0% - Jacob Brownprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 32
- Proj.
- 0.72
- O 1.5
- 18%
- Model /90
- 1.98
060%122%29%35%42%51%6+1%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.
Cards28 playersHighest: Marlon Pack, 0.25 expectedshowhide
Known defect — Prices ANY card — yellow or straight red — matching how books settle "to be shown a card" (D-048). The trends column alongside counts yellows only.
What drives it — Fouls first, then how readily the referee reaches for a card. Two officials averaging four cards a match can do it for opposite reasons. See what has actually happened.
- Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.25
- O 0.5
- 21%
- Model /90
- 0.34
079%118%23%3+0% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 0.21
- O 0.5
- 19%
- Model /90
- 0.24
081%117%22%3+0% - Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.22
083%115%22%3+0% - Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.19
- O 0.5
- 17%
- Model /90
- 0.22
083%115%22%3+0% - Terry Devlinprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.18
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.28
084%114%22%3+0% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 16%
- Model /90
- 0.28
084%114%22%3+0% - Regan Pooleprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.17
- O 0.5
- 15%
- Model /90
- 0.18
085%114%2+1% - Zak Swansonprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.16
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.21
086%113%2+1% - Connor Ogilvieprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 86
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.16
086%113%2+1% - Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 14%
- Model /90
- 0.17
086%113%2+1% - Jordan Williamsprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.15
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.21
087%112%2+1% - Luke Le Rouxprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 47
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.27
087%112%2+1% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.14
- O 0.5
- 13%
- Model /90
- 0.16
087%112%2+1% - Josh Knightprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 69
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.17
088%111%2+1% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.19
088%111%2+1% - Hayden Matthewsprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 58
- Proj.
- 0.13
- O 0.5
- 12%
- Model /90
- 0.20
088%111%2+1% - Conor Shaughnessyprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 59
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.19
089%111%2+1% - Adrian Segečićprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.17
089%110%2+1% - Márk Kosznovszkyprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 43
- Proj.
- 0.12
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.24
089%110%2+1% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 0.11
- O 0.5
- 11%
- Model /90
- 0.16
089%110%2+1%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.
Saves28 playersHighest: Nicolas Schmid, 3.16 expectedshowhide
What drives it — Opponent shot volume. A keeper’s own record carries so little that this market shrinks harder than any other on the board. See what has actually happened.
- Nicolas Schmidprovisional
GK · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 88
- Proj.
- 3.16
- O 2.5
- 58%
- Model /90
- 3.22
06%115%221%320%416%510%6+12% - Josef Bursikprovisional
GK · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 81
- Proj.
- 2.98
- O 2.5
- 55%
- Model /90
- 3.29
07%117%222%320%415%510%6+10% - Josh Knightprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 69
- Proj.
- 0.01
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.01
099%1+1% - Connor Ogilvieprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 86
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Regan Pooleprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 85
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Colby Bishopprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 82
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Andre Dozzellprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Ebou Adamsprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 77
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Josh Murphyprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 79
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Callum Langprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 76
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Zak Swansonprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 67
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Marlon Packprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 65
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Gustavo Caballeroprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 64
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Conor Chaplinprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 62
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Adrian Segečićprovisional
FWD · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 60
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Jordan Williamsprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 61
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Conor Shaughnessyprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 59
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Hayden Matthewsprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 58
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - Terry Devlinprovisional
DEF · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0% - John Swiftprovisional
MID · Portsmouth
- Mins
- 57
- Proj.
- 0.00
- O 2.5
- —
- Model /90
- 0.00
0100%1+0%
20 of 28 players shown, ranked by projection.